Literature DB >> 16738744

Biology of polypropylene/polyglactin 910 grafts.

Thomas A Barbolt1.   

Abstract

The biological evaluation of polypropylene (PP)/polyglactin 910 grafts was reviewed including regulatory considerations, biocompatibility assessment, tissue reaction and integration, and infection potentiation of these synthetic materials used in urogynecological surgical procedures. The physical characteristics of the grafts including base composition, monofilament vs multifilament, and non-absorbable vs absorbable materials were compared. Grafts were implanted in rats to evaluate the tissue reaction and integration characteristics of the materials over time. Grafts were also implanted in mice and inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus to assess the potential for bacterial attachment and growth. The tissue reaction to PP/polyglactin 910 grafts was characterized by minimal to mild inflammation with some qualitative differences related to the physical construction of the different grafts. The tissue reaction to polyglactin 910 mesh was also mild but resolved after the material was absorbed 70 days post-implantation. The integration of PP/polyglactin 910 grafts by fibrosis with surrounding tissue was initially mild for all materials but decreased over time for the lightweight and multifilament PP-based grafts, including a graft with an absorbable polyglactin 910 component. Residual fibrosis was not observed for the graft constructed from polyglactin 910 alone. Grafts constructed from PP did not potentiate infection after inoculation with S. aureus whereas the number of bacteria recovered from naturally derived collagen-based materials increased by three to four logs. The biological performance of PP/polyglactin 910 grafts is dependent on multiple factors including the composition and physical construction of the base materials, the overall biocompatibility of the materials, particularly tissue reaction and integration of the grafts, and the resistance of the grafts to bacterial attachment and growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738744     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-006-0100-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  4 in total

1.  Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue.

Authors:  Ellen Cristina Gartti-Jardim; Ariane Paredes de Souza; Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes de Souza Carvalho; Cassiano Costa Silva Pereira; Roberta Okamoto; Osvaldo Magro Filho
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-12-28

Review 2.  To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Fabrication of a microfluidic chip based on the pure polypropylene material.

Authors:  Fupeng Liang; Yi Qiao; Mengqin Duan; An Ju; Na Lu; Junji Li; Jing Tu; Zuhong Lu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Imaging findings of implanted absorbable mesh in patients with breast partial resection.

Authors:  Hyon Joo Kwag
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.759

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.