Literature DB >> 16738292

Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block versus general anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy.

Zoher Naja1, Mariam El-Rajab, Mohamad Al-Tannir, Fouad Ziade, Riad Zbibo, Mustafa Oweidat, Per-Arne Lönnqvist.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to test the hypothesis that patients receiving a nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block for hemorrhoidectomy would experience more effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia and shorter hospital stay compared to patients receiving general anesthesia.
METHODS: This was a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. Following Ethics Committee approval and informed consent, 80 patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to two groups of 40 patients each: general anesthesia alone, or nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block. Postoperative pain, the primary outcome variable of the study, was assessed by visual analogue scale scores at predetermined intervals during the postoperative period. Analgesic consumption, time to return to normal activities, patients' and surgeons' satisfaction, and duration of hospital stay were recorded.
RESULTS: The guided pudendal nerve block group failed in three patients, requiring their conversion to general anesthesia. Otherwise, patients in the pudendal nerve block group experienced better postoperative pain relief at rest (P < 0.0001), on walking, sitting, and defecation (P < 0.001), reduced need for opioids (11/35 vs 32/37; P < 0.0001), a more rapid return to normal activities (7.2 vs 13.8 days; P < 0.0001) and also a shorter hospital stay (25/35 vs 3/37 outpatient cases; P < 0.0001) compared to the general anesthesia group. Pudendal nerve block was also associated with overall higher patient satisfaction compared to general anesthesia (30/35 vs 9/37; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block is associated with reduced postoperative pain, shortened hospital stay, and earlier return to normal activity compared to general anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738292     DOI: 10.1007/BF03021848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  5 in total

1.  Ischiorectal block with bupivacaine for post hemorrhoidectomy pain.

Authors:  Mehdi Rajabi; Mehrdad Hosseinpour; Faranak Jalalvand; Mohammad Afshar; Golamabbas Moosavi; Samin Behdad
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2012-04-04

2.  [Pain management after hemorrhoidectomy. Patient-controlled analgesia vs conventional pain therapy].

Authors:  E Hancke; M Lampinski; K Suchan; K Völke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  J Castellví; A Sueiras; J Espinosa; J Vallet; V Gil; F Pi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Jian He; Lei Zhang; Dong L Li; Wan Y He; Qing M Xiong; Xue Q Zheng; Mei J Liao; Han B Wang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Post-Hoc Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Francesco Mongelli; Massimo Lucchelli; Davide La Regina; Dimitri Christoforidis; Andrea Saporito; Alberto Vannelli; Matteo Di Giuseppe
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-04-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.