Literature DB >> 16738167

Obstetric litigation is asphyxiating our maternity services.

Gary D V Hankins1, Alastair H MacLennan, Michael E Speer, Albert Strunk, Karin Nelson.   

Abstract

Obstetric care in the United States, as judged by maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, stillbirth rates, or any other metric, has never been better. Despite this, litigation over "bad outcomes" is threatening the specialty, not only now, but into the future. Despite damage to our specialty, the injured party often benefits little, if at all, from the process. Potential solutions include an emphasis on evidence-based medicine, a qualification and review process for medical experts, and a more rational and fair health court system.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738167     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000220531.25707.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

Review 1.  From "apparent death" to "birth asphyxia": a history of blame.

Authors:  Michael Obladen
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesarean section: assumptions versus evidence.

Authors:  Karin B Nelson; Thomas P Sartwelle; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women's accounts in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Michelle A Kealy; Rhonda E Small; Pranee Liamputtong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Thomas Michael O'Shea
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.190

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.