Literature DB >> 16738082

The effects of manipulating expectations through placebo and nocebo administration on gastric tachyarrhythmia and motion-induced nausea.

Max E Levine1, Robert M Stern, Kenneth L Koch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interest in the role of expectation in the development of nausea and other adverse conditions has existed for decades. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of manipulating expectations through the administration of placebos and nocebos on nausea and gastric tachyarrhythmia provoked by a rotating optokinetic drum.
METHOD: Seventy-five participants were assigned to one of three groups. Positive-expectancy group participants were given placebo pills that would allegedly protect them against the development of nausea and motion sickness. Negative-expectancy group participants were given the same pills as nocebos; they were led to believe there was a tendency for them to make nausea somewhat worse. Placebo-control group participants were told the pills were indeed placebos that would have no effect whatsoever.
RESULTS: Subjective symptoms of motion sickness were significantly lower among negative-expectancy group participants than positive-expectancy and placebo-control group participants (p<0.05). Gastric tachyarrhythmia, the abnormal stomach activity that frequently accompanies nausea, was also significantly lower among negative-expectancy group participants than positive-expectancy and Placebo-Control Group participants during drum rotation (p<.05) [corrected]
CONCLUSIONS: Inducing negative expectations through nocebo administration reduced nausea and gastric dysrhythmia during exposure to provocative motion, whereas positive placebos were ineffective for preventing symptom development. That manipulation of expectation affected gastric physiological responses as well as reports of symptoms, suggests an unspecified psychophysiological mechanism was responsible for the observed group differences. These results also suggest that patients preparing for difficult medical procedures may benefit most from being provided with detailed information about how unpleasant their condition may become.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738082     DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221377.52036.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  15 in total

1.  Placebo harm.

Authors:  I Ralph Edwards; Joe Graedon; Terry Graedon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Anna von Lilienfeld-Toal; Imis Dogan; Franziska Schreiber; Stefan G Hofmann; Arthur J Barsky; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  The placebo effect and the autonomic nervous system: evidence for an intimate relationship.

Authors:  Karin Meissner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Characterization of the adverse events profile of placebo-treated patients in randomized controlled trials on drug-resistant focal epilepsies.

Authors:  Fabio Giovannelli; Gaetano Zaccara; Massimo Cincotta; Giulia Loiacono; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Beliefs about expectations moderate the influence of expectations on pain perception.

Authors:  Ian M Handley; Stephanie L Fowler; Heather M Rasinski; Suzanne G Helfer; Andrew L Geers
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-03

6.  Brain Circuitry Supporting Multi-Organ Autonomic Outflow in Response to Nausea.

Authors:  Roberta Sclocco; Jieun Kim; Ronald G Garcia; James D Sheehan; Florian Beissner; Anna M Bianchi; Sergio Cerutti; Braden Kuo; Riccardo Barbieri; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Evidence for placebo effects on physical but not on biochemical outcome parameters: a review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Karin Meissner; Hans Distel; Ulla Mitzdorf
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  How to study placebo responses in motion sickness with a rotation chair paradigm in healthy participants.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Björn Horing; Eric R Muth; Paul Enck
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Sex and Age Differences in Motion Sickness in Rats: The Correlation with Blood Hormone Responses and Neuronal Activation in the Vestibular and Autonomic Nuclei.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Junqin Wang; Leilei Pan; Ruirui Qi; Peng Liu; Jiluo Liu; Yiling Cai
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Effects of ginger and expectations on symptoms of nausea in a balanced placebo design.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Jörg Schulte; Annamaria Maichle; Eric R Muth; Jenna L Scisco; Björn Horing; Paul Enck; Sibylle Klosterhalfen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.