BACKGROUND: Identifying and modifying burdensome aspects might reduce the level of burden and their negative effects both on caregivers and patients' outcome. Most studies evaluate acutely ill patients, whereas the most relevant problems may be related to subthreshold symptoms and long-term outcome. The aims of the present study were to assess caregiver's subjective burden, to analyse which were the most burdensome aspects for caregivers and to study which variables could explain the caregiver's subjective burden. METHODS: Caregivers of 86 euthymic bipolar patients completed the subjective burden subscale from an adapted version of the Social Behaviour Assessment Schedule. RESULTS: Caregivers showed a moderate level of subjective burden. The highest levels of distress were reported regarding the patient's behaviour; the most distressing behaviours were hyperactivity, irritability, sadness and withdrawal. Regarding the patient's role performance, the most worrying aspects were those associated with the patient's work or study and social relationships. Regarding adverse effects on others, caregivers were especially distressed by the way the illness had affected their emotional health and their life in general. Poorer social and occupational functioning, an episode in the last 2 years, history of rapid cycling and the caregiver being responsible for medication intake explained a quarter of the variance of the caregiver's subjective burden. LIMITATIONS: This was a cross-sectional study focused only on primary caregivers, there was no control group of non-bipolar patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides relevant data concerning the burden of caregivers of stable bipolar patients, pointing at potential targets for psychosocial interventions.
BACKGROUND: Identifying and modifying burdensome aspects might reduce the level of burden and their negative effects both on caregivers and patients' outcome. Most studies evaluate acutely ill patients, whereas the most relevant problems may be related to subthreshold symptoms and long-term outcome. The aims of the present study were to assess caregiver's subjective burden, to analyse which were the most burdensome aspects for caregivers and to study which variables could explain the caregiver's subjective burden. METHODS: Caregivers of 86 euthymic bipolarpatients completed the subjective burden subscale from an adapted version of the Social Behaviour Assessment Schedule. RESULTS: Caregivers showed a moderate level of subjective burden. The highest levels of distress were reported regarding the patient's behaviour; the most distressing behaviours were hyperactivity, irritability, sadness and withdrawal. Regarding the patient's role performance, the most worrying aspects were those associated with the patient's work or study and social relationships. Regarding adverse effects on others, caregivers were especially distressed by the way the illness had affected their emotional health and their life in general. Poorer social and occupational functioning, an episode in the last 2 years, history of rapid cycling and the caregiver being responsible for medication intake explained a quarter of the variance of the caregiver's subjective burden. LIMITATIONS: This was a cross-sectional study focused only on primary caregivers, there was no control group of non-bipolarpatients. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides relevant data concerning the burden of caregivers of stable bipolarpatients, pointing at potential targets for psychosocial interventions.
Authors: Lynn M Martire; Gregory A Hinrichsen; Jennifer Q Morse; Charles F Reynolds; Ariel G Gildengers; Benoit H Mulsant; Richard Schulz; Ellen Frank; David J Kupfer Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Suraj Sarvode Mothi; Neeraj Tandon; Jaya Padmanabhan; Ian T Mathew; Brett Clementz; Carol Tamminga; Godfrey Pearlson; John Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-04-19 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Josune Martín; Angel Padierna; Urko Aguirre; José M Quintana; Carlota Las Hayas; Pedro Muñoz Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maurizio Pompili; Désirée Harnic; Xenia Gonda; Alberto Forte; Giovanni Dominici; Marco Innamorati; Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Gianluca Serafini; Leo Sher; Luigi Janiri; Zoltan Rihmer; Mario Amore; Paolo Girardi Journal: World J Psychiatry Date: 2014-03-22
Authors: G M Goodwin; P M Haddad; I N Ferrier; J K Aronson; Trh Barnes; A Cipriani; D R Coghill; S Fazel; J R Geddes; H Grunze; E A Holmes; O Howes; S Hudson; N Hunt; I Jones; I C Macmillan; H McAllister-Williams; D R Miklowitz; R Morriss; M Munafò; C Paton; B J Saharkian; Kea Saunders; Jma Sinclair; D Taylor; E Vieta; A H Young Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 4.153