Literature DB >> 16737409

Efficacy and mechanism of orthotic devices to unload metatarsal heads in people with diabetes and a history of plantar ulcers.

Michael J Mueller1, Donovan J Lott, Mary K Hastings, Paul K Commean, Kirk E Smith, Thomas K Pilgram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Total-contact inserts (TCIs) and metatarsal pads (MPs) frequently are prescribed to reduce excessive plantar stresses to help prevent skin breakdown in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral neuropathy. The first purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a TCI and an MP on metatarsal head peak plantar pressures (PPP) and pressure-time integrals (PTI). The second purpose of this study was to determine a possible mechanism of pressure reduction by measuring contact area and loaded soft-tissue thickness (STT) under the metatarsal heads and second metatarsal shaft.
SUBJECTS: Twenty subjects (12 men and 8 women; age [mean+/-SD]=57+/-9 years) with DM (duration [mean+/-SD]=16+/-11 years), peripheral neuropathy, and a history of plantar ulcers participated.
METHODS: A repeated-measures research design was used, and outcome measures are reported for 3 footwear conditions: shoe, shoe with TCI, and shoe with TCI and MP. In-shoe plantar pressures were collected during walking and during spiral x-ray computed tomography (SXCT). The STT and identification of the pressure sensor and location of the MP in relationship to the metatarsal heads were determined by use of SXCT.
RESULTS: The PPP and the PTI were 16% to 24% lower at the metatarsal heads in the TCI condition than in the shoe condition. The PPP and the PTI decreased an additional 15% to 28% (for a total reduction of 29% to 47%) with the addition of the MP. The contact area increased 27% with the TCI but not with the MP. The STT did not increase under the metatarsal heads in the TCI condition (compared with the shoe condition) but did increase 8% to 22% at metatarsal heads 2 to 5 with the addition of the MP. The PPP increased substantially (308%) and the STT decreased 14% under the shaft of the second metatarsal with the addition of the MP to the TCI-plus-shoe condition. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: The TCI and the MP caused substantial and additive reductions of pressures under the metatarsal heads. The TCI reduces excessive pressures at the metatarsal heads by increasing the contact area of weight-bearing forces. Conversely, the MP acts by compressing the soft tissues proximal to the metatarsal heads and relieving compression at the metatarsal heads. These findings can assist in the design of effective orthotic devices to relieve excessive plantar stresses that contribute to skin breakdown and subsequent amputation in people with DM and peripheral neuropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16737409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  15 in total

1.  Effect of footwear and orthotic devices on stress reduction and soft tissue strain of the neuropathic foot.

Authors:  Donovan J Lott; Mary K Hastings; Paul K Commean; Kirk E Smith; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Plantar stresses on the neuropathic foot during barefoot walking.

Authors:  Michael J Mueller; Dequan Zou; Kathryn L Bohnert; Lori J Tuttle; David R Sinacore
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-09-18

3.  Data-driven CAD-CAM vs traditional total contact custom insoles: A novel quantitative-statistical framework for the evaluation of insoles offloading performance in diabetic foot.

Authors:  Moreno D'Amico; Edyta Kinel; Piero Roncoletta; Andrea Gnaldi; Celeste Ceppitelli; Federico Belli; Giuseppe Murdolo; Cristiana Vermigli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Diabetic foot biomechanics and gait dysfunction.

Authors:  James S Wrobel; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

5.  Effectiveness of removable walker cast versus nonremovable fiberglass off-bearing cast in the healing of diabetic plantar foot ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ezio Faglia; Carlo Caravaggi; Giacomo Clerici; Adriana Sganzaroli; Vincenzo Curci; Wanda Vailati; Daniele Simonetti; Francesco Sommalvico
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 17.152

6.  Effect of metatarsal phalangeal joint extension on plantar soft tissue stiffness and thickness.

Authors:  Christopher A Garcia; Shannon L Hoffman; Mary K Hastings; Joseph W Klaesner; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2008-06

7.  Multi-plug insole design to reduce peak plantar pressure on the diabetic foot during walking.

Authors:  Ricardo L Actis; Liliana B Ventura; Donovan J Lott; Kirk E Smith; Paul K Commean; Mary K Hastings; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Comparison of the pressure-relieving properties of various types of forefoot pads in older people with forefoot pain.

Authors:  Pei Y Lee; Karl B Landorf; Daniel R Bonanno; Hylton B Menz
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Effects of metatarsal domes on plantar pressures in older people with a history of forefoot pain.

Authors:  Karl B Landorf; Claire A Ackland; Daniel R Bonanno; Hylton B Menz; Saeed Forghany
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  The role of foot pressure measurement in the prediction and prevention of diabetic foot ulceration-A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Katie E Chatwin; Caroline A Abbott; Andrew J M Boulton; Frank L Bowling; Neil D Reeves
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.