BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Older subjects after hip fracture walk more slowly than age-matched peers. The extent to which they walk more slowly is difficult to define because the standard error of the measure (SEM), sensitivity to change, and clinically important change have not been reported for gait speed. The purposes of this study were to quantify the SEM for habitual and fast gait speeds among older subjects after hip fracture, to define the minimal detectable change (MDC), and to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for habitual gait speed. SUBJECTS: A sample of 92 subjects after hip fracture was drawn from 3 studies that collected gait speed data. METHODS: An estimate of the MDC was determined by use of the SEM. The MCID was determined from expert opinion and from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The SEM and the MDC were 0.08 m/s and 0.10 m/s for habitual speed and fast speed, respectively. Both methods of MCID estimation identified 0.10 m/s as a meaningful change in habitual gait speed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The estimated MCID for gait speed of 0.10 m/s was supported by clinical expert opinion and the cutoff point of the ROC curve.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Older subjects after hip fracture walk more slowly than age-matched peers. The extent to which they walk more slowly is difficult to define because the standard error of the measure (SEM), sensitivity to change, and clinically important change have not been reported for gait speed. The purposes of this study were to quantify the SEM for habitual and fast gait speeds among older subjects after hip fracture, to define the minimal detectable change (MDC), and to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for habitual gait speed. SUBJECTS: A sample of 92 subjects after hip fracture was drawn from 3 studies that collected gait speed data. METHODS: An estimate of the MDC was determined by use of the SEM. The MCID was determined from expert opinion and from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The SEM and the MDC were 0.08 m/s and 0.10 m/s for habitual speed and fast speed, respectively. Both methods of MCID estimation identified 0.10 m/s as a meaningful change in habitual gait speed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The estimated MCID for gait speed of 0.10 m/s was supported by clinical expert opinion and the cutoff point of the ROC curve.
Authors: Kathleen K Mangione; Rebecca L Craik; Kerstin M Palombaro; Susan S Tomlinson; Mary T Hofmann Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Daniel K White; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; Julie J Keysor; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Dawn E Alley; Gregory E Hicks; Michelle Shardell; William Hawkes; Ram Miller; Rebecca L Craik; Kathleen K Mangione; Denise Orwig; Marc Hochberg; Barbara Resnick; Jay Magaziner Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ming Wu; Jill M Landry; Janis Kim; Brian D Schmit; Sheng-Che Yen; Jillian Macdonald Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kathleen Kline Mangione; Rebecca L Craik; Rosalie Lopopolo; James D Tomlinson; Susan K Brenneman Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Hamza Khazzani; Fadoua Allali; Loubna Bennani; Linda Ichchou; Laila El Mansouri; Fatima E Abourazzak; Redouane Abouqal; Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 3.295