Literature DB >> 16737237

Accuracy of the diffusive gradients in thin-films technique: diffusive boundary layer and effective sampling area considerations.

Kent W Warnken1, Hao Zhang, William Davison.   

Abstract

When using the diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) technique in well-stirred solutions, the diffusive boundary layer has generally been ignored on the assumption that it is negligibly thin compared to the total thickness of delta g, i.e., the sum of the thickness of the prefilter and diffusive gel. Deployment of devices with different diffusive layer thicknesses showed that the thickness of the DBL was approximately 0.23 mm in moderate to well-stirred solutions, but substantially thicker in poorly or unstirred solutions. Measurement of the distribution of Cd in the DGT resin gel at high spatial resolution (100 microm) using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry showed that the effective sampling window had a larger diameter (2.20 cm) than the geometric diameter of the exposure window (2.00 cm). Lateral diffusion in the gel, which had previously been neglected, therefore increased the effective surface area of the device by approximately 20%. The concentrations measured by DGT agreed well with the known concentrations in standard solutions for all diffusion layer thicknesses, when the effective area and the appropriate diffusive boundary layer (DBL) were used. The extent of the error associated with neglecting the DBL and using the geometric window area depends on the gel layer thickness and the true thickness of the DBL, as determined by the deployment geometry and flow regime. When DGT measurements were made in well-stirred solutions using a 0.80-mm diffusive gel, the effect of neglecting the DBL and using the inappropriate geometric area offset each other, with the error being <+/-10%. For precise measurements, and especially work involving speciation or kinetic measurements, where DGT devices with different diffusive gel layer thicknesses are deployed, it is necessary to use the effective area and the appropriate DBL thickness in the full DGT equation, which allows for the use of layer-specific diffusion coefficients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16737237     DOI: 10.1021/ac060139d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  10 in total

1.  Predicting mercury bioavailability in soil for earthworm Eisenia fetida using the diffusive gradients in thin films technique.

Authors:  Viet Huu Nguyen; Seah Kah Yee; Yongseok Hong; Deok Hyun Moon; Seunghee Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  In situ measurement with diffusive gradients in thin films: effect of biofouling in freshwater.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Uher; Chantal Compère; Matthieu Combe; Florence Mazeas; Catherine Gourlay-Francé
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Distribution character of localized iron microniche in lake sediment microzone revealed by chemical image.

Authors:  Zhihao Wu; Shengrui Wang; Ningning Ji
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Passive Sampling Tool for Actinides in Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools.

Authors:  Joshua D Chaplin; Marcus Christl; Marietta Straub; François Bochud; Pascal Froidevaux
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Sediment metal bioavailability in Lake Taihu, China: evaluation of sequential extraction, DGT, and PBET techniques.

Authors:  Jinghua Ren; Paul N Williams; Jun Luo; Hongrui Ma; Xiaorong Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Analyzing the uncertainty of diffusive gel-based passive samplers as tools for evaluating the averaged contamination of surface water by organic pollutants.

Authors:  Angel Belles; Claire Alary; Nellaïdeve Laguerre; Christine Franke
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Numerical evaluation of lateral diffusion inside diffusive gradients in thin films samplers.

Authors:  Jakob Santner; Andreas Kreuzeder; Andrea Schnepf; Walter W Wenzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Estimation of Measurement Uncertainties for the DGT Passive Sampler Used for Determination of Copper in Water.

Authors:  Jesper Knutsson; Sebastien Rauch; Gregory M Morrison
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 1.885

9.  Uncertainty evaluation of the diffusive gradients in thin films technique.

Authors:  Andreas Kreuzeder; Jakob Santner; Hao Zhang; Thomas Prohaska; Walter W Wenzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: state of the science for metals.

Authors:  Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Peter R Teasdale; Danny Reible; Julie Mondon; William W Bennett; Peter G C Campbell
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.992

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.