Literature DB >> 16736190

Personalized medicine and development of targeted therapies: The upcoming challenge for diagnostic molecular pathology. A review.

Manfred Dietel1, Christine Sers.   

Abstract

Due to continuous technical developments and new insights into the high complexity of many diseases, molecular pathology is a rapidly growing field gaining center stage in the clinical management of tumors as well as in the pharmaceutical development of new anti-cancer drugs. The application of novel compounds in clinical trials has revealed promising results; however, the current diagnostic procedures available for determining which patients will primarily benefit from rational tumor therapy are insufficient. To read a patient's tissue as "deeply" as possible, in the future, gaining information on the morphology and on genetic, proteomic, and epigenetic alterations will be the upcoming task of surgical pathologists experienced in molecular diagnostics to provide the clinicians with information relevant for an individualized medicine. Among the different high-throughput technologies, DNA microarrays are now the first array approach close to enter routine diagnostics. Technically advanced and well-established microarray platforms can nowadays be evaluated by distinct bioinformatic tools capable of identifying both novel genes associated with disease development and clusters of genes predicting clinical outcome of an individual tumor. The automatic, highly parallel analysis of proteins and complex proteins lysates for early detection of cancers such as breast, prostate and ovary as proteomic patterns in the serum also appears at the horizon. In addition, an improved analysis of tumor samples via antibody or reverse-phase protein arrays is likely to provide the pathologist in the future with information about activated oncogenic signaling pathways and other cell functions, such as drug response or the potential to metastasize. While expression microarrays and proteomic analysis rely on relatively unstable material incompatible with paraffin-embedded tissue samples, an investigation of DNA methylation using specialized high-throughput platforms has revealed the potential of being used in future diagnostics. Each of these approaches on its own might not suffice to extract all information required for an efficient individualized diagnostics. Therefore, a "multiplex approach" combining the different biological levels DNA, RNA, and protein, may be necessary to functionally classify malignant tumors. This appears to become a major challenge for diagnostic pathologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736190     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-006-0189-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  94 in total

Review 1.  Protein microarrays: meeting analytical challenges for clinical applications.

Authors:  Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina; Arpita I Mehta; Valerie Calvert; Kevin Rosenblatt; David Geho; Peter J Munson; Lynn Young; Julia Wulfkuhle; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Lessons from controversy: ovarian cancer screening and serum proteomics.

Authors:  David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Laser capture microdissection and colorectal cancer proteomics.

Authors:  Laura C Lawrie; Stephanie Curran
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2005

4.  Molecular staging for survival prediction of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Steven Eschrich; Ivana Yang; Greg Bloom; Ka Yin Kwong; David Boulware; Alan Cantor; Domenico Coppola; Mogens Kruhøffer; Lauri Aaltonen; Torben F Orntoft; John Quackenbush; Timothy J Yeatman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  M Bittner; P Meltzer; Y Chen; Y Jiang; E Seftor; M Hendrix; M Radmacher; R Simon; Z Yakhini; A Ben-Dor; N Sampas; E Dougherty; E Wang; F Marincola; C Gooden; J Lueders; A Glatfelter; P Pollock; J Carpten; E Gillanders; D Leja; K Dietrich; C Beaudry; M Berens; D Alberts; V Sondak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Pharmacogenomic dissection of resistance to thymidylate synthase inhibitors.

Authors:  W Wang; S Marsh; J Cassidy; H L McLeod
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Identification by cDNA microarray of genes involved in ovarian carcinogenesis.

Authors:  K Ono; T Tanaka; T Tsunoda; O Kitahara; C Kihara; A Okamoto; K Ochiai; T Takagi; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Protein profiling of microdissected prostate tissue links growth differentiation factor 15 to prostate carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Peter K Cheung; Bruce Woolcock; Hans Adomat; Margaret Sutcliffe; Terry C Bainbridge; Edward C Jones; Douglas Webber; Thomas Kinahan; Marianne Sadar; Martin E Gleave; Juergen Vielkind
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Profiling receptor tyrosine kinase activation by using Ab microarrays.

Authors:  Ulrik B Nielsen; Mike H Cardone; Anthony J Sinskey; Gavin MacBeath; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Similarities of prosurvival signals in Bcl-2-positive and Bcl-2-negative follicular lymphomas identified by reverse phase protein microarray.

Authors:  Hongbin Zha; Mark Raffeld; Lu Charboneau; Stefania Pittaluga; Larry W Kwak; Emanuel Petricoin; Lance A Liotta; Elaine S Jaffe
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.662

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and molecular diagnosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Shelby D Melton; Robert M Genta; Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Personalized cancer medicine and the future of pathology.

Authors:  H Moch; P R Blank; M Dietel; G Elmberger; K M Kerr; J Palacios; F Penault-Llorca; G Rossi; T D Szucs
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Where we publish : an analysis of the publications of German institutes of pathology.

Authors:  Florian Rudolf Fritzsche; Manfred Dietel; Glen Kristiansen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Predictive Analytics to Support Real-Time Management in Pathology Facilities.

Authors:  Lysanne Lessard; Wojtek Michalowski; Wei Chen Li; Daniel Amyot; Fawaz Halwani; Diponkar Banerjee
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Words matter: distinguishing "personalized medicine" and "biologically personalized therapeutics".

Authors:  Nathan I Cherny; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Linda Emanuel; Lesley Fallowfield; Prudence A Francis; Alberto Gabizon; Martine J Piccart; David Sidransky; Lior Soussan-Gutman; Chariklia Tziraki
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Pathologists and liquid biopsies: to be or not to be?

Authors:  Paul Hofman; Helmut H Popper
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Breast cancer diagnosis using a microfluidic multiplexed immunohistochemistry platform.

Authors:  Minseok S Kim; Taemin Kim; Sun-Young Kong; Soim Kwon; Chae Yun Bae; Jaekyu Choi; Chul Hwan Kim; Eun Sook Lee; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The RNA binding protein HuR differentially regulates unique subsets of mRNAs in estrogen receptor negative and estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert Calaluce; Matthew M Gubin; J Wade Davis; Joseph D Magee; Jing Chen; Yuki Kuwano; Myriam Gorospe; Ulus Atasoy
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Comparison of automated silver enhanced in situ hybridisation (SISH) and fluorescence ISH (FISH) for the validation of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma according to the guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  M Dietel; I O Ellis; H Höfler; H Kreipe; H Moch; A Dankof; K Kölble; G Kristiansen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Postal survey of physicians and laboratories: practices and perceptions of molecular oncology testing.

Authors:  Fiona A Miller; Paul Krueger; Robert J Christensen; Catherine Ahern; Ronald F Carter; Suzanne Kamel-Reid
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.