AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of reinforced follow-up via telecare mediated by the local pharmacist in contact with the hospital team to improve glycaemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (DT1). METHODS:One hundred patients, aged 8 to 17 years, with a history of DT1 of more than 1 year, with HbA(1c) >=8%, were randomly assigned to either the "reinforced follow-up" group (RFG) or the "usual follow-up" group (UFG). The intervention consisted in downloading and then printing data stored in a glucometer every two weeks, by the local pharmacist. Printouts were faxed to the hospital team which then communicated adapted instructions for better glycemic control directly to the family. RESULTS:Fifty patients were assigned to each group. The two groups were comparable at the beginning. 71 children had a doctor's visit at 6 +/- 1 months (36 in RFG and 35 in UFG). At this date, there was no significant difference between the average HbA(1c) levels of the two groups (9.12 +/- 1.46 in RFG versus 9.27 +/- 1.20 in UFG). We had various difficulties setting up and gaining compliance with the intervention procedure, which explains why only 33 children in the RFG transmitted at least one fax. CONCLUSION: At this stage, the reinforced follow-up has not proved to be superior to the usual follow-up. However, it would be possible to make numerous improvements in order to make the former more feasible and probably more efficient.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of reinforced follow-up via telecare mediated by the local pharmacist in contact with the hospital team to improve glycaemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (DT1). METHODS: One hundred patients, aged 8 to 17 years, with a history of DT1 of more than 1 year, with HbA(1c) >=8%, were randomly assigned to either the "reinforced follow-up" group (RFG) or the "usual follow-up" group (UFG). The intervention consisted in downloading and then printing data stored in a glucometer every two weeks, by the local pharmacist. Printouts were faxed to the hospital team which then communicated adapted instructions for better glycemic control directly to the family. RESULTS: Fifty patients were assigned to each group. The two groups were comparable at the beginning. 71 children had a doctor's visit at 6 +/- 1 months (36 in RFG and 35 in UFG). At this date, there was no significant difference between the average HbA(1c) levels of the two groups (9.12 +/- 1.46 in RFG versus 9.27 +/- 1.20 in UFG). We had various difficulties setting up and gaining compliance with the intervention procedure, which explains why only 33 children in the RFG transmitted at least one fax. CONCLUSION: At this stage, the reinforced follow-up has not proved to be superior to the usual follow-up. However, it would be possible to make numerous improvements in order to make the former more feasible and probably more efficient.
Authors: Roslyn A Stone; Mary Ann Sevick; R Harsha Rao; David S Macpherson; Chunrong Cheng; Sunghee Kim; Linda J Hough; Frederick R DeRubertis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Paul Sutcliffe; Steven Martin; Jackie Sturt; John Powell; Frances Griffiths; Ann Adams; Jeremy Dale Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: Fenne Verhoeven; Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen; Karin Dijkstra; Nicol Nijland; Erwin Seydel; Michaël Steehouder Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2007-12-14 Impact factor: 5.428