Literature DB >> 16735902

The role of positron emission tomography scans in the management of the N-positive neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy.

Victoria S Brkovich1, Frank R Miller, Anand B Karnad, David H Hussey, H Stan McGuff, Randal A Otto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting residual cervical metastatic disease in patients with N-positive necks undergoing curative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the upper aerodigestive tract.
METHODS: The authors studied a prospective case series of patients (2003-2005) of patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck SSC. Study entry criteria included N-positive neck disease, a complete response to treatment at the primary tumor site, posttreatment PET scan (8-12 weeks after completion of treatment), followed by salvage neck dissection. The posttreatment PET scan neck findings were correlated to the salvage neck dissection pathology report. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the PET scan to predict residual cervical metastatic disease after curative chemoradiotherapy were calculated.
RESULTS: Twenty-one neck dissections (pretreatment N1 = 5, N2a = 2, N2b = 8, N3 = 6) were entered into the protocol. Four (19.0%) of the 21 neck specimens were positive for residual cervical metastatic disease, whereas the remaining 17 (80.9%) specimens demonstrated no residual carcinoma. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 75.0% and 64.7%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 33% and the negative predictive value was 91.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the role of posttreatment neck dissection remains controversial, the surgeon must rely on clinical examination and imaging studies. Our practice has been to perform planned staged neck dissections on all N2 and N3 necks, as well as N1 necks with an incomplete response to treatment. Based on this small prospective study, it appears that PET imaging lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity to reliably predict the presence of residual cervical metastatic disease after completion of chemoradiotherapy. With a negative predictive value of 91.7%, however, a negative PET scan appears to be a reliable predictor of the absence of residual tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735902     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000214668.98592.d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  15 in total

Review 1.  The role of FDG PET-CT in the therapeutic evaluation for HNSCC patients.

Authors:  Joji Kawabe; Shigeaki Higashiyama; Atsushi Yoshida; Kohei Kotani; Susumu Shiomi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Controversies in the management of tongue base cancer.

Authors:  J P O'Neill; J P Hughes; K P Manning; J E Fenton
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: the point of view of the radiation oncologist.

Authors:  Jon Cacicedo; Arturo Navarro; Olga Del Hoyo; Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga; Filippo Alongi; Jose A Medina; Olgun Elicin; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile; Pedro Bilbao; Francisco Casquero; Berardino de Bari; Alan Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Post-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Matthew J Kruse; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 6.  Positron emission tomography for neck evaluation following definitive treatment with chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Voichita Bar-Ad; Mark Mishra; Nitin Ohri; Charles Intenzo
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02

7.  Reliability of post-chemoradiotherapy F-18-FDG PET/CT for prediction of locoregional failure in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Matthew E Spector; Matthew H Stenmark; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Francis P Worden; Douglas B Chepeha; Jonathan B McHugh; Thomas Carey; Ka Kit Wong; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  Use of PET in Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Halil Erdem Özel
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-01

9.  Salvage surgery after induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin and primary radiotherapy for advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas.

Authors:  A Relic; M Scheich; J Stapf; C Voelter; F Hoppe; R Hagen; L Pfreundner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Current trends in initial management of oropharyngeal cancer: the declining use of open surgery.

Authors:  Missak Haigentz; Carl E Silver; June Corry; Eric M Genden; Robert P Takes; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.