PURPOSE: Readiness to change drinking may influence the content or effectiveness of brief alcohol counseling. This study was designed to assess readiness to change and its relationship to alcohol misuse severity among primary care patients whose screening questionnaire was positive for alcohol misuse. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 2 consecutive mailed questionnaires. Male outpatients at 7 Veterans Affairs (VA) general medicine clinics were eligible if they returned both questionnaires, screened positive for alcohol misuse (augmented CAGE Questionnaire > or =1 point), responded to 3 readiness-to-change questions, and completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). A validated algorithm based on 3 standardized questions categorized participants into 3 readiness groups (precontemplation, contemplation, action). Measures of alcohol misuse severity included AUDIT, CAGE, and the 3 consumption questions from the AUDIT (AUDIT-C). Analyses were descriptive; linear-by-linear associations between alcohol misuse severity and readiness were tested with chi2 statistics. RESULTS: Response rates to the first and second surveys were 59% and 55%, respectively. Of the 6,419 eligible outpatients who screened positive for alcohol misuse, 4,797 (75%) reported any readiness to change (contemplation 24%, action 51%). Among patients with AUDIT scores >8, more than 90% indicated that they drank more than they should and/or had contemplated drinking less. Greater readiness was significantly associated with greater alcohol misuse severity (P <.001 for all measures). CONCLUSIONS: Most primary care patients who screen positive for alcohol misuse indicate some readiness to change. Contrary to stereotypes of denial, those with greater alcohol misuse severity are more likely to report readiness to change.
PURPOSE: Readiness to change drinking may influence the content or effectiveness of brief alcohol counseling. This study was designed to assess readiness to change and its relationship to alcohol misuse severity among primary care patients whose screening questionnaire was positive for alcohol misuse. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 2 consecutive mailed questionnaires. Male outpatients at 7 Veterans Affairs (VA) general medicine clinics were eligible if they returned both questionnaires, screened positive for alcohol misuse (augmented CAGE Questionnaire > or =1 point), responded to 3 readiness-to-change questions, and completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). A validated algorithm based on 3 standardized questions categorized participants into 3 readiness groups (precontemplation, contemplation, action). Measures of alcohol misuse severity included AUDIT, CAGE, and the 3 consumption questions from the AUDIT (AUDIT-C). Analyses were descriptive; linear-by-linear associations between alcohol misuse severity and readiness were tested with chi2 statistics. RESULTS: Response rates to the first and second surveys were 59% and 55%, respectively. Of the 6,419 eligible outpatients who screened positive for alcohol misuse, 4,797 (75%) reported any readiness to change (contemplation 24%, action 51%). Among patients with AUDIT scores >8, more than 90% indicated that they drank more than they should and/or had contemplated drinking less. Greater readiness was significantly associated with greater alcohol misuse severity (P <.001 for all measures). CONCLUSIONS: Most primary care patients who screen positive for alcohol misuse indicate some readiness to change. Contrary to stereotypes of denial, those with greater alcohol misuse severity are more likely to report readiness to change.
Authors: Katharine A Bradley; Daniel R Kivlahan; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Jennifer L Sporleder; Amee J Epler; Kinsey A McCormick; Joseph O Merrill; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Stephan D Fihn; Mary B McDonell; Paula Diehr; Stephen M Anderson; Katharine A Bradley; David H Au; John A Spertus; Marcia Burman; Gayle E Reiber; Catarina I Kiefe; Marisue Cody; Karen M Sanders; Mary A Whooley; Kenneth Rosenfeld; Linda A Baczek; Arthur Sauvigne Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Evelyn P Whitlock; Michael R Polen; Carla A Green; Tracy Orleans; Jonathan Klein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-04-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brendan J Clark; Alexandra Smart; Robert House; Ivor Douglas; Ellen L Burnham; Marc Moss Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Emily C Williams; Tibor Palfai; Debbie M Cheng; Jeffrey H Samet; Katharine A Bradley; Thomas D Koepsell; Thomas M Wickizer; Patrick J Heagerty; Richard Saitz Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Annika C Montag; Stephanie K Brodine; John E Alcaraz; John D Clapp; Matthew A Allison; Dan J Calac; Andrew D Hull; Jessica R Gorman; Kenneth Lyons Jones; Christina D Chambers Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michael W Stroud; Charles H Bombardier; Joshua R Dyer; Carl T Rimmele; Peter C Esselman Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Dylan K Richards; Osvaldo F Morera; José A Cabriales; Juliana Cardoso Smith; Craig A Field Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 2.826