Literature DB >> 16735201

A new safety event reporting system improves physician reporting in the surgical intensive care unit.

Douglas J E Schuerer1, Patricia A Nast, Carolyn B Harris, Melissa J Krauss, Rebecca M Jones, Walter A Boyle, Timothy G Buchman, Craig M Coopersmith, W Claiborne Dunagan, Victoria J Fraser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical errors are common, and physicians have notably been poor medical error reporters. In the SICU, reporting was generally poor and reporting by physicians was virtually nonexistent. This study was designed to observe changes in error reporting in an SICU when a new card-based system (SAFE) was introduced. STUDY
DESIGN: Before implementation of the SAFE reporting system, education was given to all SICU healthcare providers. The SAFE system was introduced into the SICU for a 9-month period from March 2003 through November 2003, to replace an underused online system. Data were collected from the SAFE card reports and the online reporting systems during introduction, removal, and reimplementation of these cards. Reporting rates were calculated as number of reported events per 1,000 patient days.
RESULTS: Reporting rates increased from 19 to 51 reports per 1,000 patient days after the SAFE cards were introduced into the ICU (p</= 0.001). Physician reporting increased most, rising from 0.3 to 5.8 reports per 1,000 patient days; nursing reporting also increased from 18 to 39 reports per 1,000 patient days (both p</=0.001). When the SAFE cards were removed, physician reporting declined to 0 reports per 1,000 patient days (p=0.01) and rose to 8.1 (p=0.001) when the cards were returned, similar to nursing results. A higher proportion of physician reports were events that caused harm compared with no effect (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A card reporting system, combined with appropriate education, improved overall reporting in the SICU, especially among physician providers. Nurses were more likely to use reporting systems than were physicians. Physician reports were more likely to be of events that caused harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735201     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

1.  Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?

Authors:  Brian P Chen; Katie Garland; Darren M Roffey; Stephane Poitras; Geoffrey Dervin; Peter Lapner; Philippe Phan; Eugene K Wai; Stephen P Kingwell; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A Multilevel Analysis of U.S. Hospital Patient Safety Culture Relationships With Perceptions of Voluntary Event Reporting.

Authors:  Jonathan D Burlison; Rebecca R Quillivan; Lisa M Kath; Yinmei Zhou; Sam C Courtney; Cheng Cheng; James M Hoffman
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.243

3.  An analysis of near misses identified by anesthesia providers in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Angela K M Lipshutz; James E Caldwell; David L Robinowitz; Michael A Gropper
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Fan Jiang; Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Carlo Santaguida; Michael H Weber; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

5.  Beyond clinical engagement: a pragmatic model for quality improvement interventions, aligning clinical and managerial priorities.

Authors:  Samuel Pannick; Nick Sevdalis; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Medication-related incidents at 19 hospitals: A retrospective register study using incident reports.

Authors:  Maria Cottell; Inger Wätterbjörk; Maria Hälleberg Nyman
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-05-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.