Literature DB >> 16735197

Altered in vitro chondrogenic properties of chondrocytes harvested from unaffected cartilage in osteoarthritic joints.

K G A Yang1, D B F Saris, R E Geuze, M H P van Rijen, Y J M van der Helm, A J Verbout, L B Creemers, W J A Dhert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In vitro models of chondrogenesis often depart from chondrocytes harvested from less-affected areas of osteoarthritic joints. However, there are indications that these chondrocytes are phenotypically different from chondrocytes from healthy joints and thus might differ in their capacity to generate hyaline cartilage. The goal of this study was to compare the chondrogenic capacity of chondrocytes from healthy and OA joints.
DESIGN: Chondrocytes isolated from nine healthy and nine OA knee joints were expanded in monolayer for two passages. Chondrocytes from passages 1 and 2 were analyzed for expression of (de)differentiation and hypertrophy markers and were seeded at passage 2 on collagen-coated filters for redifferentiation culture to study cartilage matrix formation.
RESULTS: The collagen II/I mRNA ratio, reflecting differentiation, decreased from passage 1 to 2 in both chondrocytes from OA joints and chondrocytes from healthy joints (P<0.05), without a significant difference between the two donor types. At passage 1, levels of the cartilage transcription factors Sox-5, Sox-6 and Sox-9 appeared to be higher in chondrocytes from OA joints (n.s.), but this was not seen at passage 2. However, a clear difference was observed in collagen type X expression, which was high in chondrocytes from OA joints at both passages, while undetectable in chondrocytes from healthy joints (P<0.01). Tissue generated by chondrocytes from healthy joints redifferentiated for 28 days, showed a significantly better morphology, as assessed by histological scoring (P<0.01) and higher proteoglycan content (P<0.05), compared to chondrocytes from OA joints. Matrix turnover parameters, i.e., proteoglycan synthesis and degradation rate, were not significantly affected by donor tissue origin.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that clear differences between chondrocytes from healthy and OA joints exist and that these are not completely abolished during the process of de- and redifferentiation. Therefore, in vitro cartilage regeneration models, which use chondrocytes from OA joints, should be interpreted with care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735197     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  21 in total

1.  Matrix metalloproteinase 13 loss associated with impaired extracellular matrix remodeling disrupts chondrocyte differentiation by concerted effects on multiple regulatory factors.

Authors:  Rosa Maria Borzí; Eleonora Olivotto; Stefania Pagani; Roberta Vitellozzi; Simona Neri; Michela Battistelli; Elisabetta Falcieri; Annalisa Facchini; Flavio Flamigni; Marianna Penzo; Daniela Platano; Spartaco Santi; Andrea Facchini; Kenneth B Marcu
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-08

2.  Donor Variation and Optimization of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Chondrogenesis in Hyaluronic Acid.

Authors:  Minwook Kim; Isaac E Erickson; Alice H Huang; Sean T Garrity; Robert L Mauck; David R Steinberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Osteoarthritic human chondrocytes proliferate in 3D co-culture with mesenchymal stem cells in suspension bioreactors.

Authors:  Madiha Khurshid; Aillette Mulet-Sierra; Adetola Adesida; Arindom Sen
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  Regulation of human chondrocyte function through direct inhibition of cartilage master regulator SOX9 by microRNA-145 (miRNA-145).

Authors:  Aida Martinez-Sanchez; Katarzyna A Dudek; Chris L Murphy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Chondrogenic capacity and alterations in hyaluronan synthesis of cultured human osteoarthritic chondrocytes.

Authors:  Yohei Ono; Tadahiro Sakai; Hideki Hiraiwa; Takashi Hamada; Takaaki Omachi; Motoshige Nakashima; Shinya Ishizuka; Tetsuya Matsukawa; Warren Knudson; Cheryl B Knudson; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Expansion and redifferentiation of chondrocytes from osteoarthritic cartilage: cells for human cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Nancy D Hsieh-Bonassera; Iwen Wu; Jonathan K Lin; Barbara L Schumacher; Albert C Chen; Koichi Masuda; William D Bugbee; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Multimodal evaluation of tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Joseph M Mansour; Jean F Welter
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.553

8.  Expression of ion channels of the TRP family in articular chondrocytes from osteoarthritic patients: changes between native and in vitro propagated chondrocytes.

Authors:  K Gavenis; C Schumacher; U Schneider; J Eisfeld; J Mollenhauer; B Schmidt-Rohlfing
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.396

9.  A Novel Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Porous Scaffold for Cartilage Repair: An In Vitro Study With Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes.

Authors:  Christoph Bauer; Manuela Berger; Renate R Baumgartner; Sonja Höller; Hannes Zwickl; Eugenia Niculescu-Morzsa; Florian Halbwirth; Stefan Nehrer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Chondrogenic differentiation potential of osteoarthritic chondrocytes and their possible use in matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation.

Authors:  Tilo Dehne; Camilla Karlsson; Jochen Ringe; Michael Sittinger; Anders Lindahl
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.