Literature DB >> 16734853

Urodynamic evaluation of a suspension technique for rapid recovery of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Masanori Noguchi1, Akihiko Shimada, Osamu Nakashima, Masamichi Kojiro, Kei Matsuoka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated urodynamic findings involved in the rapid recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy with a suspension technique.
METHODS: A total of 45 consecutive patients (mean age 67.6 years) who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer were evaluated with multichannel urodynamics including the maximal urethral pressure (MUP), functional urethral length (FUL), maximal cystometric capacity (MCC) and abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) at base line, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The suspension of vesicourethral anastomosis preserving anterior attachments of puboprostatic ligaments to pubic bone was performed in 33 patients. Twelve patients did not undergo the suspension technique.
RESULTS: The continence rates at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after radical prostatectomy in the suspension group were significantly higher than those in the non-suspension group: 67% versus 0% at 1 week (P < 0.001), 82% versus 25% at 1 month (P < 0.001), and 91% versus 50% at 3 months (P < 0.01), respectively. Postoperative ALPP at all points of measurement was significantly higher in the suspension group than in the non-suspension group (P < 0.0002). There was no difference in MUP, FUL or MCC at each point following radical prostatectomy between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that preserving anterior attachments of puboprostatic ligaments to pubic bone and fixation of urethral hyper-mobility by the suspension of vesicourethral anastomosis promotes rapid recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16734853     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01313.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  6 in total

1.  Influence of bladder neck suspension stitches on early continence after radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized study of 180 patients.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Martin Nicolaus; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Tim Häfner; George Sakellaropoulos; James Hicks; David Nikoleishvili; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post-radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; John O L DeLancey; Hero K Hussain; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; Anne P Cameron
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Pros and cons of focal therapy for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Luigi Mearini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10

Review 4.  Pelvic Floor Reconstruction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Jianfeng Cui; Hu Guo; Yan Li; Shouzhen Chen; Yaofeng Zhu; Shiyu Wang; Yong Wang; Xigao Liu; Wenbo Wang; Jie Han; Pengxiang Chen; Shuping Nie; Gang Yin; Benkang Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Dongho Shin; Joonho Ahn; Hyeok Jae Kwon; Kyung Jae Hur; Hyong Woo Moon; Yong Hyun Park; Hyuk Jin Cho; U-Syn Ha; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Woong Jin Bae
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 6.  De Novo Detrusor Underactivity and Other Urodynamic Findings after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maciej Oszczudłowski; Konrad Bilski; Mieszko Kozikowski; Jakub Dobruch
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.