Literature DB >> 16732606

Modulation of the soft tissue reactions to percutaneous orthopaedic implants.

T J Smith1, A Galm, S Chatterjee, R Wells, S Pedersen, A Meimandi Parizi, A E Goodship, G W Blunn.   

Abstract

To evaluate soft tissue reactions and biofilm formation on percutaneous external fixator screws coated with diamond-like carbon (DLC) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings on stainless-steel (SS) pins in an ovine loaded osteotomy model, an Orthofix external fixator was used to stabilize a 3-mm tibial midshaft osteotomy with six tapered pins inserted into the right tibia of 32 skeletally mature Friesland ewes. Animals were divided into four groups; SS, fully coated HA, DLC, and HA-coated threads. At 10 weeks, specimens were harvested and the pins were removed en bloc to examine the interfaces between the surface coatings and the tissues. Fully coated HA pins had a significantly higher percentage of dermal contact with the pin surface than HA-coated threads (p=0.028). The presence of a biofilm was evident on all pin surfaces except DLC-coated pins. Significantly greater numbers of bacteria were present on fully coated HA and plain stainless-steel pins compared with DLC. The surface of DLC-coated pins had a significantly lower number of bacterial colonies compared to SS (p=0.028) and fully coated HA pins (p=0.005). Fully coated HA pins have greater dermal attachment to the pin surface than the other pin coatings investigated. DLC-coated pins have the potential to prevent biofilm formation and bacterial colonization that may reduce infection and consequent pin loosening. An external fixator pin that is partially coated with HA to encourage bone and soft tissue integration and with DLC to reduce biofilm formation is advocated. Copyright (c) 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16732606     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  New method of fixation of in-bone implanted prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin; Charles Cassidy; Raghuveer Muppavarapu; James Raymond; Maxim Shevtsov; Oleg Galibin; Serge D Rousselle
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

2.  Biomimetic coatings and negative pressure wound therapy independently limit epithelial downgrowth around percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Sujee Jeyapalina; Saranne J Mitchell; Jayant Agarwal; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  [Percutaneous titanium implants for bone conduction hearing aids: experience with 283 cases].

Authors:  P A Federspil; A Koch; M H Schneider; K Zaoui
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Percutaneous implants with porous titanium dermal barriers: an in vivo evaluation of infection risk.

Authors:  Dorthyann Isackson; Lawrence D McGill; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Mesenchymal stem cells increase collagen infiltration and improve wound healing response to porous titanium percutaneous implants.

Authors:  Dorthyann Isackson; Kevin J Cook; Lawrence D McGill; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  Implantable hearing devices.

Authors:  Matthias Tisch
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of skin integration on titanium and PEEK implants with different surface treatments.

Authors:  Per Kjellin; Karin Danielsson; Joakim Håkansson; Karin Agrenius; Therese Andersson; Patrik Stenlund
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.727

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.