Literature DB >> 16732343

[Data collection methods and results in user surveys in mental health care].

Øyvind Andresen Bjertnaes1, Andrew Garratt, Jan Olav Johannessen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Questionnaires on patient experience are increasingly used as quality indicators in the health services. There is limited evidence relating to alternative approaches to surveying patients within this field. We wanted to assess the effect of different methods of data collection on response rates and scores produced by a self-administered questionnaire on patient experience for adult inpatients receiving mental health care.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from adult inpatients treated at three community mental health centres affiliated with the psychiatric clinic at Stavanger University hospital in spring 2005. The inclusion period was nine weeks, with three designs at consecutive time periods: A, a postal survey following discharge; B, a clinical survey before discharge; and C, patients given the choice of A or B.
RESULTS: The response rate was highest with the postal design (38% vs. 24% and 23% respectively), but the differences were related to one additional reminder in the postal design. Out of the 11 questions, 4 had significantly poorer scores for the postal design. Questionnaire scores were significantly poorer with the postal design; 50 (on a scale from 0 to 100), vs. 59 and 63 in design B and C respectively.
INTERPRETATION: The choice of data collection methods influences the results in user surveys in mental health care. This is an important consideration in the planning of studies and in the interpretation of the results, and in the comparison of results between studies using different data collection methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16732343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen        ISSN: 0029-2001


  7 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of the Psychiatric Inpatient Patient Experience Questionnaire - Continuous Electronic Measurement (PIPEQ-CEM).

Authors:  Hilde Hestad Iversen; Mona Haugum; Oyvind Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Hilde Hestad Iversen; Olaf Holmboe; Oyvind Andresen Bjertnæs
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Parent experiences questionnaire for outpatient child and adolescent mental health services (PEQ-CAMHS Outpatients): reliability and validity following a national survey.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt; Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Olaf Holmboe; Ketil Hanssen-Bauer
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Patient experiences questionnaire for interdisciplinary treatment for substance dependence (PEQ-ITSD): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway.

Authors:  Mona Haugum; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Oyvind Bjertnaes; Anne Karin Lindahl
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Inpatients' assessment of outcome at psychiatric institutions: an analysis of predictors following a national cross-sectional survey in Norway.

Authors:  Oyvind Bjertnaes; Hilde Hestad Iversen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  PIPEQ-OS--an instrument for on-site measurements of the experiences of inpatients at psychiatric institutions.

Authors:  Oyvind Bjertnaes; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Johanne Kjollesdal
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Parent experiences of inpatient pediatric care in relation to health care delivery and sociodemographic characteristics: results of a Norwegian national survey.

Authors:  Erling Solheim; Andrew M Garratt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.