OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine crossnationally the prevalence of indicators of elder abuse and their relationship to putative risk factors, particularly depression, dementia, and lack of service provision. METHOD: Nearly 4,000 people aged 65+ receiving health or social community services in 11 European countries were interviewed using the minimum dataset homecare (MDS-HC) interview, which includes an abuse screen used previously in elder abuse studies and questions about demographic, physical, psychiatric, cognitive, and service factors. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine (4.6%) people assessed had at least one indicator of abuse. The proportion screening positive increased with severity of cognitive impairment, presence of depression, delusions, pressure ulcers, actively resisting care, less informal care, expressed conflict with family or friends, or living in Italy or Germany, but not with having a known psychiatric diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Severity of cognitive impairment, depression, and delusions predicted screening positive for abuse in older adults, but having a known psychiatric diagnosis did not, indicating that screening for psychiatric morbidity might be rational strategies to combat elder abuse. People in Italy and Germany were most likely to screen positive for indicators of abuse, and the authors suggest that this might relate to higher levels of dependency in the participants looked after at home in these countries as a result of cultural and service provision differences.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine crossnationally the prevalence of indicators of elder abuse and their relationship to putative risk factors, particularly depression, dementia, and lack of service provision. METHOD: Nearly 4,000 people aged 65+ receiving health or social community services in 11 European countries were interviewed using the minimum dataset homecare (MDS-HC) interview, which includes an abuse screen used previously in elder abuse studies and questions about demographic, physical, psychiatric, cognitive, and service factors. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine (4.6%) people assessed had at least one indicator of abuse. The proportion screening positive increased with severity of cognitive impairment, presence of depression, delusions, pressure ulcers, actively resisting care, less informal care, expressed conflict with family or friends, or living in Italy or Germany, but not with having a known psychiatric diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Severity of cognitive impairment, depression, and delusions predicted screening positive for abuse in older adults, but having a known psychiatric diagnosis did not, indicating that screening for psychiatric morbidity might be rational strategies to combat elder abuse. People in Italy and Germany were most likely to screen positive for indicators of abuse, and the authors suggest that this might relate to higher levels of dependency in the participants looked after at home in these countries as a result of cultural and service provision differences.
Authors: Jesús Rivera-Navarro; Rosa Sepúlveda; Israel Contador; Bernardino Fernández-Calvo; Francisco Ramos; Miguel Ángel Tola-Arribas; Miguel Goñi Journal: Eur J Ageing Date: 2017-04-20
Authors: Jutta Lindert; Juan de Luna; Francisco Torres-Gonzales; Henrique Barros; Elisabeth Ioannidi-Kopolou; Maria Gabriella Melchiorre; Mindaugas Stankunas; Gloria Macassa; Joaquim F J Soares Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Norma B Coe; R Tamara Konetzka; Melissa Berkowitz; Emily Blecker; Courtney H Van Houtven Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 21.981