Literature DB >> 16731364

3.0 T versus 1.5 T: coil design similarities and differences.

Randy Duensing1, Jeffrey Fitzsimmons.   

Abstract

The advent of large RF coil arrays, multi-channel receivers, and other specialized image acquisition techniques offer considerable gains in SNR, however, these applications in combination with higher field strength 3.0 T magnets introduce several challenges. In addition to higher cost, the 3.0 T requires more training and maintenance, but these obstacles are offset by its improved diagnostic images and shorter acquisition times. Thus, 3.0 T magnets have not yet left 1.5 T magnets entirely obsolete, despite the 3.0 T's ability to double SNR.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731364     DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-5149            Impact factor:   2.264


  2 in total

Review 1.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  MRI Head Coil Malfunction Producing Artifacts Mimicking Malformation of Cortical Development in Pediatric Epilepsy Work-Up.

Authors:  N Kashani; N Khan; J M Ospel; X-C Wei
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.825

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.