BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma (AC) is the most common lung cancer, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Controversy exists concerning both cell types. Our purpose was to compare their prognosis after resection and determine whether AC subtyping may have any significance. METHODS: From 1993 to 2002, 574 patients with SCC and 565 with AC underwent a curative resection and were compared according to sex, age, type of resection, TNM system classification, and survival. One hundred fifty-nine patients with ACs demonstrated a pure histologic pattern according to the 1999 World Health Organization classification, and 406 were of the mixed subtype including cell types with potentially different aggressiveness. Therefore, we compared subgroups according to presence or not of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma or solid adenocarcinoma with mucin component, or both. RESULTS: Compared with ACs, SCCs had a higher number of males and older patients, and incidences of endobronchial tumors, pneumonectomies, and stage II tumors were higher. Global survival rates were not different. The ACs with solid AC with mucin components (n = 239) were characterized by more males and stage IIB patients, and had poorer survival rates (38.6% vs 61.4%; p < 0.0014) than the ACs without solid AC with mucin component. When comparing these with SCCs, 5-year survival rates were: ACs without solid AC with mucin component (58.1%), SCCs (50.2%), and ACs with solid AC with mucin component (36.8%) (p < 0.000019). Multivariate analysis demonstrated these subgroups and SCCs to be independent factors of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Solid ACs with a mucin component demonstrated the poorest prognosis after resection. Further studies of this cell type, which should be looked for carefully, may help improve targetting adjuvant therapies.
BACKGROUND:Adenocarcinoma (AC) is the most common lung cancer, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Controversy exists concerning both cell types. Our purpose was to compare their prognosis after resection and determine whether AC subtyping may have any significance. METHODS: From 1993 to 2002, 574 patients with SCC and 565 with AC underwent a curative resection and were compared according to sex, age, type of resection, TNM system classification, and survival. One hundred fifty-nine patients with ACs demonstrated a pure histologic pattern according to the 1999 World Health Organization classification, and 406 were of the mixed subtype including cell types with potentially different aggressiveness. Therefore, we compared subgroups according to presence or not of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma or solid adenocarcinoma with mucin component, or both. RESULTS: Compared with ACs, SCCs had a higher number of males and older patients, and incidences of endobronchial tumors, pneumonectomies, and stage II tumors were higher. Global survival rates were not different. The ACs with solid AC with mucin components (n = 239) were characterized by more males and stage IIB patients, and had poorer survival rates (38.6% vs 61.4%; p < 0.0014) than the ACs without solid AC with mucin component. When comparing these with SCCs, 5-year survival rates were: ACs without solid AC with mucin component (58.1%), SCCs (50.2%), and ACs with solid AC with mucin component (36.8%) (p < 0.000019). Multivariate analysis demonstrated these subgroups and SCCs to be independent factors of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Solid ACs with a mucin component demonstrated the poorest prognosis after resection. Further studies of this cell type, which should be looked for carefully, may help improve targetting adjuvant therapies.
Authors: William D Travis; Elisabeth Brambilla; Masayuki Noguchi; Andrew G Nicholson; Kim R Geisinger; Yasushi Yatabe; David G Beer; Charles A Powell; Gregory J Riely; Paul E Van Schil; Kavita Garg; John H M Austin; Hisao Asamura; Valerie W Rusch; Fred R Hirsch; Giorgio Scagliotti; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Rudolf M Huber; Yuichi Ishikawa; James Jett; Montserrat Sanchez-Cespedes; Jean-Paul Sculier; Takashi Takahashi; Masahiro Tsuboi; Johan Vansteenkiste; Ignacio Wistuba; Pan-Chyr Yang; Denise Aberle; Christian Brambilla; Douglas Flieder; Wilbur Franklin; Adi Gazdar; Michael Gould; Philip Hasleton; Douglas Henderson; Bruce Johnson; David Johnson; Keith Kerr; Keiko Kuriyama; Jin Soo Lee; Vincent A Miller; Iver Petersen; Victor Roggli; Rafael Rosell; Nagahiro Saijo; Erik Thunnissen; Ming Tsao; David Yankelewitz Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Luisa M Solis; Carmen Behrens; M Gabriela Raso; Heather Y Lin; Humam Kadara; Ping Yuan; Hector Galindo; Ximing Tang; J Jack Lee; Neda Kalhor; Ignacio I Wistuba; Cesar A Moran Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stephen L Graziano; Benjamin Lacas; Robin Vollmer; Robert Kratzke; Helmut Popper; Martin Filipits; Lesley Seymour; Frances A Shepherd; Rafael Rosell; Anne Sophie Veillard; Miquel Taron; Jean-Pierre Pignon Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2013-08-04 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Yi-Chen Yeh; Jun-ichi Nitadori; Kyuichi Kadota; Akihiko Yoshizawa; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Camelia S Sima; Valerie W Rusch; Prasad S Adusumilli; William D Travis Journal: Histopathology Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 5.087