Literature DB >> 16731072

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletins: an overview.

Suneet P Chauhan1, Vincenzo Berghella, Maureen Sanderson, Everett F Magann, John C Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practices bulletins to quantify the type of recommendations and references and determining whether there are any differences between obstetric and gynecologic bulletins. STUDY
DESIGN: All practice bulletins published from June 1998 to December 2004 were reviewed. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: The 55 practice bulletins contained 438 recommendations of which 29% are level A, 33% level B, and 38% level C. The 55 bulletins cite 3953 references of which 17% are level I, 46% level II, 34% level III, and 3% others. Level A recommendations were significantly more likely among the 23 gynecologic than 32 obstetric bulletins (37% versus 23%, odds ratios 1.95, 95% confidence intervals 1.28, 2.96). The study types referenced in obstetric and gynecologic bulletins were similar (P > .05 for comparison of levels I, II, and III and meta-analysis references).
CONCLUSION: Only 29% of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations are level A, based on good and consistent scientific evidence.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731072     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine in obstetrics: can levels B and C recommendations be elevated to level A recommendations?

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Eugene Chang; Brian Brost; Barbara Assel; Jason Baxter; James A Smith; Robert Grobman; Vincenzo Berghella; James A Scardo; Everett F Magann; John C Morrison
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2009-05-22

2.  Quality criteria for randomized controlled studies: obstetrical journal guidelines.

Authors:  Kathryn Anderson; Roberto Romero; Anthony O Odibo; Dwight Rouse; Michael Marsh; Ganesh Acharya; Lyn Chitty; Olaf Ortmann; Michael Geary; Eduard Gratacos; Patrick G Gallagher; Janesh Gupta; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Dev Maulik; Caroline de Costa; George Saade; Joachim W Dudenhausen; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-02-16

3.  Incorporation of randomized controlled trials into organizational guidelines for obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Rigoberto Gutierrez; Matthew Bicocca; Gregory Opara; Megha Gupta; Michal Fishel Bartal; Suneet P Chauhan; Stephen Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2022-01-12

Review 4.  Endometriosis: A Review of Clinical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Saurabh Chauhan; Akash More; Vaishnavi Chauhan; Aditya Kathane
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-06

Review 5.  Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ulrich Siering; Michaela Eikermann; Elke Hausner; Wiebke Hoffmann-Eßer; Edmund A Neugebauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Big data in healthcare: are we close to it?

Authors:  Elliot Naidus; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  Association Between the Physician Quality Score in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and Hospital Performance in Hospital Compare in the First Year of the Program.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Changyong Feng; Stewart J Lustik; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.