Literature DB >> 1673098

Expression of the mouse labial-like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain.

P Murphy1, R E Hill.   

Abstract

The sequence of a mouse Hox 2.9 cDNA clone is presented. The predicted homeodomain is similar to that of the Drosophila gene labial showing 80% identity. The equivalent gene in the Hox 1 cluster is Hox 1.6 which shows extensive similarity to Hox 2.9 both within and outside the homeodomain. Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6 are the only two mouse members of the labial-like family of homeobox-containing genes as yet identified. Hox 2.9 has previously been shown to be expressed in a single segmental unit of the developing hindbrain (rhombomere) and has been predicted to be involved in conferring rhombomere identity. To analyse further the function of Hox 2.9 during development and to determine if the other mouse labial-like gene Hox 1.6, displays similar properties, we have investigated the expression patterns of these two genes and an additional rhombomere-specific gene, Krox 20, on consecutive embryonic sections at closely staged intervals. This detailed analysis has enabled us to draw the following conclusions: (1) There are extensive similarities in the temporal and spatial expression of Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, throughout the period that both genes are expressed in the embryo (7 1/2 to 10 days). At 8 days the genes occupy identical domains in the neuroectoderm and mesoderm with the same sharp anterior boundary in the presumptive hindbrain. These similarities indicate a functional relationship between the genes and further suggest that the labial-like genes are responding to similar signals in the embryo. (2) By 9 days the neuroectoderm expression of both genes retreats posteriorly along the anteroposterior (AP) axis. The difference at this stage between the expression patterns is the persistence of Hox 2.9 in a specific region of the hindbrain, illustrating the capacity of Hox 2.9 to respond to additional positional regulatory signals and indicating a unique function for this gene in the hindbrain. (3) The restriction of Hox 2.9 expression in the hindbrain occurs at 8 1/2 days, approximately the same time as Krox 20 is first detected in the posterior adjoining domain. The mutually exclusive expression of Hox 2.9 and Krox 20 demarcated by sharp expression boundaries suggest that compartmentalisation of cells within the hindbrain has occurred up to 6 h before rhombomeres (morphological segments) are clearly visible. (4) Hox 2.9 expression is confined to the region of rhombomere 4 that shows cell lineage restriction and, unlike Krox 20, is expressed throughout the period that rhombomeres are visible (to 11 1/2 days).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1673098     DOI: 10.1242/dev.111.1.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  46 in total

1.  Mechanisms of Hox gene colinearity: transposition of the anterior Hoxb1 gene into the posterior HoxD complex.

Authors:  M Kmita; F van Der Hoeven; J Zákány; R Krumlauf; D Duboule
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Krox-20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous mechanisms.

Authors:  F Giudicelli; E Taillebourg; P Charnay; P Gilardi-Hebenstreit
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Functional evolution in the ancestral lineage of vertebrates or when genomic complexity was wagging its morphological tail.

Authors:  Rami Aburomia; Oded Khaner; Arend Sidow
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

4.  Hox-1.11 and Hox-4.9 homeobox genes.

Authors:  A Nazarali; Y Kim; M Nirenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Conservation of the TGFbeta/Labial homeobox signaling loop in endoderm-derived cells between Drosophila and mammals.

Authors:  Gwen A Lomberk; Issei Imoto; Brian Gebelein; Raul Urrutia; Tiffany A Cook
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  New nucleotide sequence data on the EMBL File Server.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Detection of homeobox genes in development and evolution.

Authors:  M T Murtha; J F Leckman; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Clinical characterization of the HOXA1 syndrome BSAS variant.

Authors:  T M Bosley; M A Salih; I A Alorainy; D T Oystreck; M Nester; K K Abu-Amero; M A Tischfield; E C Engle
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Hox genes: choreographers in neural development, architects of circuit organization.

Authors:  Polyxeni Philippidou; Jeremy S Dasen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  The fates of zebrafish Hox gene duplicates.

Authors:  Chris Jozefowicz; James McClintock; Victoria Prince
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.