Literature DB >> 16730974

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) alone is not an appropriate surrogate marker of long-term therapeutic benefit in prostate cancer trials.

Laurence Collette1, Tomasz Burzykowski, Fritz H Schröder.   

Abstract

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most studied marker of prostate cancer. It is used for screening and as indicator of disease evolution for individual patients. PSA being a prognostic factor is however not sufficient to justify using PSA-derived endpoints as surrogate for definitive survival endpoint in phase III trials. First, we clarify the terminology and requirements for a marker to be a valid surrogate endpoint. We then review the published literature pertaining to the validation of PSA endpoints as surrogate in all disease stages. We discuss the limitations of these studies and conclude that so far, PSA is not a validated surrogate endpoint in any of the disease settings and treatment conditions considered. We give some recommendations for the planning of trials that would use PSA endpoints (in hormone refractory disease) and for the early stop of (endocrine treatment) trials on the basis of intermediate results based on PSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16730974     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  16 in total

1.  MUC1 is upregulated in advanced prostate cancer and is an independent prognostic factor.

Authors:  V Genitsch; I Zlobec; G N Thalmann; A Fleischmann
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 2.  Immunotherapy for prostate cancer: biology and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Edward Cha; Lawrence Fong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Medical strategies for treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) docetaxel resistant.

Authors:  Amelia Altavilla; Roberto Iacovelli; Giuseppe Procopio; Daniele Alesini; Emanuela Risi; Giuseppe Maria Campennì; Antonella Palazzo; Enrico Cortesi
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  The relative efficiency of time-to-threshold and rate of change in longitudinal data.

Authors:  M C Donohue; A C Gamst; R G Thomas; R Xu; L Beckett; R C Petersen; M W Weiner; P Aisen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Telomere DNA content in prostate biopsies predicts early rise in prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eric G Treat; Christopher M Heaphy; Larry W Massie; Marco Bisoffi; Anthony Y Smith; Michael S Davis; Jeffrey K Griffith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Qian Shi; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  TROG 96.01: TTBF and PSAdt as surrogates for disease specific mortality.

Authors:  Christopher J Hoimes; Wm Kevin Kelly
Journal:  Update Cancer Ther       Date:  2009

8.  When progressive disease does not mean treatment failure: reconsidering the criteria for progression.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Oxnard; Michael J Morris; F Stephen Hodi; Laurence H Baker; Mark G Kris; Alan P Venook; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Prostate cancer-specific survival differences in patients treated by radical prostatectomy versus curative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Julie M Degroot; Michael D Brundage; Miu Lam; Susan L Rohland; Jeremy Heaton; William J Mackillop; D Robert Siemens; Patti A Groome
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Issues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial.

Authors:  Matthew R Sydes; Mahesh K B Parmar; Nicholas D James; Noel W Clarke; David P Dearnaley; Malcolm D Mason; Rachel C Morgan; Karen Sanders; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.