OBJECTIVE: This is a systematic review to assess published scientific evidence on preterm birth predictors. METHODS: An Internet search for predictors of preterm birth was performed and the evidence level of each method was evaluated. RESULTS: There is strong evidence that preterm birth can be predicted using vaginal sonography to evaluate cervical characteristics, fetal fibronectin in cervicovaginal secretions and interleukin-6 in amniotic fluid. There is consistent evidence that digital cervical examination is a weak predictor, and controversy regarding home uterine activity monitoring. There is scanty evidence about the predictive ability of maternal history and perceptions of symptoms since the study design fails to provide high evidence level. CONCLUSION: Cervical evaluation by vaginal sonography, fetal fibronectin and interleukin-6 are the best methods for predicting preterm birth.
OBJECTIVE: This is a systematic review to assess published scientific evidence on preterm birth predictors. METHODS: An Internet search for predictors of preterm birth was performed and the evidence level of each method was evaluated. RESULTS: There is strong evidence that preterm birth can be predicted using vaginal sonography to evaluate cervical characteristics, fetal fibronectin in cervicovaginal secretions and interleukin-6 in amniotic fluid. There is consistent evidence that digital cervical examination is a weak predictor, and controversy regarding home uterine activity monitoring. There is scanty evidence about the predictive ability of maternal history and perceptions of symptoms since the study design fails to provide high evidence level. CONCLUSION: Cervical evaluation by vaginal sonography, fetal fibronectin and interleukin-6 are the best methods for predicting preterm birth.
Authors: Michele L Okun; James F Luther; Stephen R Wisniewski; Dorothy Sit; Beth A Prairie; Katherine L Wisner Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Charles J Lockwood; William K Murk; Umit A Kayisli; Lynn F Buchwalder; S Joseph Huang; Felice Arcuri; Min Li; Arun Gopinath; Frederick Schatz Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Sophie Serriere; Laurent Barantin; François Seguin; François Tranquart; Lydie Nadal-Desbarats Journal: MAGMA Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Jan Walter; Linda Fraga; Melanie J Orin; William D Decker; Theresa Gipps; Alice Stek; Grace M Aldrovandi Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Yujing Jan Heng; Craig Edward Pennell; Hon Nian Chua; Jonathan Edward Perkins; Stephen James Lye Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 3.240