Literature DB >> 16729732

Characterization of protein-ligand interaction sites using experimental and computational methods.

Sandor Vajda1, Frank Guarnieri.   

Abstract

The ability to identify the sites of a protein that can bind with high affinity to small, drug-like compounds has been an important goal in drug design. Accurate prediction of druggable sites and the identification of small compounds binding in those sites have provided the input for fragment-based combinatorial approaches that allow for a more thorough exploration of the chemical space, and that have the potential to yield molecules that are more lead-like than those found using traditional high-throughput screening. Current progress in experimental and computational methods for identifying and characterizing druggable ligand binding sites on protein targets is reviewed herein, including a discussion of successful nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray crystallography and tethering technologies. Classical geometric and energy-based computational methods are also discussed, with particular focus on two powerful technologies, that is, computational solvent mapping and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations (as used by Locus Pharmaceuticals Inc). Both methods can be used to reliably identify druggable sites on proteins and to facilitate the design of novel, low-nanomolar-affinity ligands.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16729732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel        ISSN: 1367-6733


  26 in total

1.  The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Structural genomics of protein phosphatases.

Authors:  Steven C Almo; Jeffrey B Bonanno; J Michael Sauder; Spencer Emtage; Teresa P Dilorenzo; Vladimir Malashkevich; Steven R Wasserman; S Swaminathan; Subramaniam Eswaramoorthy; Rakhi Agarwal; Desigan Kumaran; Mahendra Madegowda; Sugadev Ragumani; Yury Patskovsky; Johnjeff Alvarado; Udupi A Ramagopal; Joana Faber-Barata; Mark R Chance; Andrej Sali; Andras Fiser; Zhong-yin Zhang; David S Lawrence; Stephen K Burley
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2007-12-05

Review 3.  Application of NMR and molecular docking in structure-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Jaime L Stark; Robert Powers
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2012

4.  Ligand deconstruction: Why some fragment binding positions are conserved and others are not.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Stefan Jehle; Sefan Jehle; Lingqi Luo; Stefan O Ochiana; Elizabeth V Jones; Michael Pollastri; Karen N Allen; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multistructural hot spot characterization with FTProd.

Authors:  Lane Votapka; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Pocket-based drug design: exploring pocket space.

Authors:  Xiliang Zheng; Linfeng Gan; Erkang Wang; Jin Wang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Fragment-based identification of druggable 'hot spots' of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques.

Authors:  Ryan Brenke; Dima Kozakov; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Dmitri Beglov; David Hall; Melissa R Landon; Carla Mattos; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Antiviral compounds discovered by virtual screening of small-molecule libraries against dengue virus E protein.

Authors:  Zhigang Zhou; Mansoora Khaliq; Jae-Eun Suk; Chinmay Patkar; Long Li; Richard J Kuhn; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Automated clustering of probe molecules from solvent mapping of protein surfaces: new algorithms applied to hot-spot mapping and structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Michael G Lerner; Kristin L Meagher; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Binding-site assessment by virtual fragment screening.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.