Literature DB >> 16729228

Treatment of unresectable primary and metastatic liver cancer with yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere): assessment of hepatic arterial embolization.

Kent Sato1, Robert J Lewandowski, James T Bui, Reed Omary, Russell D Hunter, Laura Kulik, Mary Mulcahy, David Liu, Howard Chrisman, Scott Resnick, Albert A Nemcek, Robert Vogelzang, Riad Salem.   

Abstract

In Canada and Europe, yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere); MDS Nordion, Ottawa, Canada) are a primary treatment option for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. We present data from 30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic liver disease treated with TheraSphere from a single academic institution to evaluate the angiographically evident embolization that follows treatment. Seven interventional radiologists from one treatment center compared pretreatment and posttreatment angiograms. The reviewers were blinded to the timing of the studies. The incidence of postembolization syndrome (PES) was determined as well as objective tumor response rates by the World Health Organization (WHO), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. There were 420 independent angiographic observations that were assessed using the chi-squared statistic. The pretreatment and posttreatment angiograms could not be correctly identified on average more than 43% of the time (p = 0.0004). The postprocedure arterial patency rate was 100%. The objective tumor response rates for all patients were 24%, 31%, and 72% for WHO, RECIST, and EASL criteria, respectively. All of the patients tolerated the procedure without complications and were treated on an outpatient basis, and four patients had evidence of PES. This treatment method does not result in macroscopic embolization of the hepatic arteries, thereby maintaining hepatic tissue perfusion. These data support the principle that the favorable response rates reported with TheraSphere are likely due to radiation and microscopic embolization rather than flow-related macroscopic embolization and ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16729228     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0171-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  74 in total

1.  Hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization prior to transplantation.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Marco Colasanti; Edoardo De Werra; Gianluca Mascianà; Daniele Ferraro; Giovanni Tortorelli; Rosa Sciuto; Pierleone Lucatelli; Giuseppe Pizzi; Ubaldo Visco-Comandini; Giovanni Vennarecci
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and microsphere embolization for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Xie; Jiajie Zang; Xiaojing Guo; Feng Xu; Rongxi Shen; Long Yan; Jiamei Yang; Jia He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Bland Liver Tumor Embolization Complicated by Hepatic Abscess.

Authors:  Omar H Elsayed-Ali; Andrew J Lipnik; Daniel B Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Edward Wang; Ahsun Riaz; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Ramona Gupta; Paul Nikolaidis; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Saad M Ibrahim; Seanthan Senthilnathan; Talia Baker; Vanessa L Gates; Bassel Atassi; Steven Newman; Khairuddin Memon; Richard Chen; Robert L Vogelzang; Albert A Nemcek; Scott A Resnick; Howard B Chrisman; James Carr; Reed A Omary; Michael Abecassis; Al B Benson; Mary F Mulcahy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: conventional versus drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Boris Gorodetski; Julius Chapiro; Ruediger Schernthaner; Rafael Duran; MingDe Lin; Howard Lee; David Lenis; Elizabeth A Stuart; Bareng Aletta Sanny Nonyane; Vasily Pekurovsky; Anobel Tamrazi; Bernhard Gebauer; Todd Schlachter; Timothy M Pawlik; Jean-Francois Geschwind
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Perspective: Flicking with flow: Can microfluidics revolutionize the cancer research?

Authors:  Tamal Das; Suman Chakraborty
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 7.  Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  F Edward Boas; Lisa Bodei; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Conventional transarterial chemoembolization vs microsphere embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Yan Ni; Lin-Feng Xu; Wei-Dong Wang; Hong-Liang Sun; Yao-Ting Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and perspectives.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Cinzia Pettinato; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

10.  Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis.

Authors:  M A D Vente; M Wondergem; I van der Tweel; M A A J van den Bosch; B A Zonnenberg; M G E H Lam; A D van Het Schip; J F W Nijsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.