Literature DB >> 16728722

Functional significance of the sperm head morphometric size and shape for determining freezability in iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm samples.

Milagros C Esteso1, Ana J Soler, María R Fernández-Santos, Armando A Quintero-Moreno, Jose J Garde.   

Abstract

In the present study, computer-automated sperm head morphometry of epididymal samples was used to determine if sperm head area and shape are useful measurements for separating "good" and "bad" Iberian red deer freezers. A microscope slide was prepared from single diluted sperm fresh samples collected from 38 mature stags. Slides were air-dried and stained with Hemacolor. The sperm head area and shape (length/width) for a minimum of 145 sperm heads were determined for each male by means of the Sperm-Class Analyser. The remainder of each sample was frozen. After thawing, sperm cryosurvival was judged in vitro by microscopic assessments of individual sperm motility and of plasma membrane and acrosome integrities. All sperm parameters evaluated at thawing were placed in a statistical database and a multivariate cluster analysis performed. Mean sperm parameters of the 2 clusters generated ("bad" and "good" freezers) were compared by ANOVA. Our results show that sperm quality at thawing for all sperm parameters evaluated was significantly higher (P < .01) for "good" freezers than for the "bad" ones (sperm motility index: 67.4 +/- 2.0 vs 57.1 +/- 2.8; NAR: 67.1 +/- 2.5 vs 54.5 +/- 3.5; viability: 68.8 +/- 2.0 vs 60.1 +/- 2.8; HOST: 71.3 +/- 2.2 vs 63.1 +/- 3.1). Additionally, differences (P < .01) in epididymal sperm head area and shape were found between "good" and "bad" freezers before freezing, with the smallest overall sperm head dimensions found in the "good" freezers group (area: 32.04 microm2 vs 34.42 microm2). Thus, the lower the sperm head area in the fresh samples, the greater the sperm cryoresistance. Our results show that the 2 groups of males also differ in sperm head shape in fresh samples (good: 1.96 vs poor: 1.72; P < .01). It is possible that sperm head area and shape influence total sperm volume, thus causing differences in heat exchange as well as in movements of water, ions, and cryoprotectants and, in turn, on sperm freezability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16728722     DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.106.000489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  12 in total

1.  Treatment of male goats with equine chorionic gonadotrophin during the non-breeding season does not affect their sperm characteristics during the subsequent breeding season.

Authors:  Florencia Beracochea; María Noel Viera; Julián Santiago-Moreno; Rodolfo Ungerfeld
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Relationship between the seasonal changes in plasma testosterone and thyroxine concentrations with sperm cryoresistance in Gabon bucks.

Authors:  Viera María Noel; Ungerfeld Rodolfo; Velázquez Rosario; Santiago-Moreno Julián
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Sperm flagellum volume determines freezability in red deer spermatozoa.

Authors:  José Luis Ros-Santaella; Alvaro Efrén Domínguez-Rebolledo; José Julián Garde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Foreword to Sperm morphometrics today and tomorrow special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology.

Authors:  Carles Soler; Trevor G Cooper
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Improving sperm banking efficiency in endangered species through the use of a sperm selection method in brown bear (Ursus arctos) thawed sperm.

Authors:  L Anel-Lopez; C Ortega-Ferrusola; M Álvarez; S Borragán; C Chamorro; F J Peña; J Morrell; L Anel; P de Paz
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Adult and yearling pampas deer stags (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) display mild reproductive seasonal patterns with maximum values in autumn.

Authors:  Rodolfo Ungerfeld; Matías Villagrán; Jorge Gil-Laureiro; Adrián Sestelo; Florencia Beracochea; Fernando Fumagalli; Alejandro Bielli
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 1.807

7.  The effect of the staining technique on morphological and morphometric parameters of boar sperm.

Authors:  Magdalena Czubaszek; Katarzyna Andraszek; Dorota Banaszewska; Renata Walczak-Jędrzejowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Morphology and head morphometric characters of sperm in Thai native crossbred stallions.

Authors:  Kanittha Phetudomsinsuk; Kaitkanoke Sirinarumitr; Aree Laikul; Anuchai Pinyopummin
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 9.  Current status and potential of morphometric sperm analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Maroto-Morales; Olga García-Álvarez; Manuel Ramón; Felipe Martínez-Pastor; M Rocío Fernández-Santos; A Josefa Soler; José Julián Garde
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Recent advances in bird sperm morphometric analysis and its role in male gamete characterization and reproduction technologies.

Authors:  Julian Santiago-Moreno; Milagros Cristina Esteso; Silvia Villaverde-Morcillo; Adolfo Toledano-Déaz; Cristina Castaño; Rosario Velázquez; Antonio López-Sebastián; Agustín López Goya; Javier Gimeno Martínez
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.