BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited data are available on management of outpatients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and on clinicians' reasons for withholding procedures recommended by guidelines. We assessed to what extent guidelines are appropriately applied after ischemic stroke or TIA, in admitted patients as well as outpatients. METHODS: A survey was conducted in 11 centers in the Netherlands, which prospectively enrolled 579 admitted patients and 393 outpatients. Data were collected by trained research assistants. Duplicate assessment in 10% of patients showed good agreement with neurologists (median kappa=0.86). Treating neurologists were asked to provide arguments for withholding recommended procedures in eligible patients. RESULTS: Recommended acute procedures were provided in the majority of admitted patients, but less often in outpatients: brain imaging (98% and 93%, respectively), 12-lead ECG (96% and 81%), laboratory tests (97% and 86%), aspirin within 48 hours (90% and 68% of eligible patients). Secondary preventive measures were not always taken in both eligible inpatients and eligible outpatients: carotid endarterectomy (provided in 31% and 30% of patients), antiplatelet agents (93% and 90%), oral anticoagulants (60% and 48%), antihypertensive agents (57% and 44%), and cholesterol-lowering therapy (71% and 52%). Reasons for withholding recommended procedures were plausible for almost all admitted patients, but were unclear in the majority of outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other national stroke surveys, we found high-quality acute care in admitted ischemic stroke patients, whereas secondary prevention was comparably poor. Although the majority of our centers have rapid-access TIA clinics, there is still substantial potential to improve quality of stroke care in outpatients.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited data are available on management of outpatients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and on clinicians' reasons for withholding procedures recommended by guidelines. We assessed to what extent guidelines are appropriately applied after ischemic stroke or TIA, in admitted patients as well as outpatients. METHODS: A survey was conducted in 11 centers in the Netherlands, which prospectively enrolled 579 admitted patients and 393 outpatients. Data were collected by trained research assistants. Duplicate assessment in 10% of patients showed good agreement with neurologists (median kappa=0.86). Treating neurologists were asked to provide arguments for withholding recommended procedures in eligible patients. RESULTS: Recommended acute procedures were provided in the majority of admitted patients, but less often in outpatients: brain imaging (98% and 93%, respectively), 12-lead ECG (96% and 81%), laboratory tests (97% and 86%), aspirin within 48 hours (90% and 68% of eligible patients). Secondary preventive measures were not always taken in both eligible inpatients and eligible outpatients: carotid endarterectomy (provided in 31% and 30% of patients), antiplatelet agents (93% and 90%), oral anticoagulants (60% and 48%), antihypertensive agents (57% and 44%), and cholesterol-lowering therapy (71% and 52%). Reasons for withholding recommended procedures were plausible for almost all admitted patients, but were unclear in the majority of outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other national stroke surveys, we found high-quality acute care in admitted ischemic strokepatients, whereas secondary prevention was comparably poor. Although the majority of our centers have rapid-access TIA clinics, there is still substantial potential to improve quality of stroke care in outpatients.
Authors: Dawn M Bravata; Laura J Myers; Greg Arling; Edward J Miech; Teresa Damush; Jason J Sico; Michael S Phipps; Alan J Zillich; Zhangsheng Yu; Mathew Reeves; Linda S Williams; Jason Johanning; Seemant Chaturvedi; Fitsum Baye; Susan Ofner; Curt Austin; Jared Ferguson; Glenn D Graham; Rachel Rhude; Chad S Kessler; Donald S Higgins; Eric Cheng Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Judith A Hinchey; Timothy Shephard; Sarah T Tonn; Robin Ruthazer; Richard C Hermann; Harry P Selker; David M Kent Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: J Jaime Miranda; Miguel G Moscoso; Lijing L Yan; Francisco Diez-Canseco; Germán Málaga; Hector H Garcia; Bruce Ovbiagele Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Barbara J Homoya; Teresa M Damush; Jason J Sico; Edward J Miech; Gregory W Arling; Laura J Myers; Jared B Ferguson; Michael S Phipps; Eric M Cheng; Dawn M Bravata Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Janette de Goede; W M Monique Verschuren; Jolanda M A Boer; Daan Kromhout; Johanna M Geleijnse Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Janette de Goede; W M Monique Verschuren; Jolanda M A Boer; Daan Kromhout; Johanna M Geleijnse Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nicola L M Paul; Silvia Koton; Michela Simoni; Olivia C Geraghty; Ramon Luengo-Fernandez; Peter M Rothwell Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Aznida Firzah Abdul Aziz; Noor Azah Abd Aziz; Nor Azlin Mohd Nordin; Mohd Fairuz Ali; Saperi Sulong; Syed Mohamed Aljunid Journal: J Neurosci Rural Pract Date: 2013-10