Literature DB >> 16727790

Effect of heat shock on function of frozen/thawed bull spermatozoa.

V H Monterroso1, K C Drury, A D Ealy, J L Edwards, P J Hansen.   

Abstract

Deposition of spermatozoa in the reproductive tract of hyperthermic cows could conceivably result in sperm damage. Accordingly, a series of experiments tested the effects of heat shock on functional characteristics and free radical production of bull spermatozoa. Viability was reduced slightly by short-term (1 to 3 h) culture at 42 and 43 degrees C as compared with culture at 39 degrees C. There was no effect of culture at 42 degrees C on the ability of spermatozoa to undergo swim-up or of 42 degrees C on the percentage of motile spermatozoa. However, exposure to 41 degrees C for 3 h reduced percentage of motile sperm, 41 and 42 degrees C reduced sperm velocity and 43 degrees C decreased the proportion of spermatozoa undergoing swim-up. In other experiments, there was no effect of heat shock (41 or 42 degrees C for 1 to 3 h) on DNA integrity, presence of intact acrosomes, or fertilizing ability of the spermatozoa. Superoxide production by spermatozoa was higher at 42 degrees C than at 39 or 41 degrees C, but there was no detectable hydrogen peroxide production at any temperature. The antioxidant, glutathione, tended to improve the ability of spermatozoa to undergo swim-up at 39 degrees C but not at 43 degrees C. Taken together, these results suggest that heat shock of a magnitude similar to that seen in vivo (41 to 42 degrees C) has little effect on sperm functions that affect fertilizing capability.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16727790     DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(95)00282-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  Relation of the maximum temperature and relative humidity close to the insemination with the tropical milking criollo heifer's gestation in three seasons.

Authors:  Froylan Rosales-Martínez; Adalberto Rosendo-Ponce; César Cortez-Romero; Jaime Gallegos-Sánchez; Juan M Cuca-García; Carlos M Becerril-Pérez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  The Physiological and Evolutionary Ecology of Sperm Thermal Performance.

Authors:  Wayne Wen-Yeu Wang; Alex R Gunderson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Impacts of in vitro thermal stress on ovine epididymal spermatozoa and the protective effect of β-mercaptoethanol as an antioxidant.

Authors:  Ebrahim Ahmadi; Narges Tahmasebian-Ghahfarokhi; Maryam Nafar-Sefiddashti; Marzieh Sadeghi-Sefiddashti; Hossein Hassanpour
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 1.054

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.