Literature DB >> 16725245

The influence of significant others in complementary and alternative medicine decisions by cancer patients.

Joakim Ohlén1, Lynda G Balneaves, Joan L Bottorff, Alison S A Brazier.   

Abstract

Individuals living with cancer are faced with numerous treatment decisions that encompass both conventional therapies and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Although a beginning body of research has explored the CAM decision-making process by cancer patients, the social context of these treatment decisions has been largely ignored. As a part of a larger grounded theory research project exploring CAM decision-making processes of cancer patients living in British Columbia, Canada, the purpose of this secondary inquiry was to explore how significant others were involved in patients' decisions related to CAM. In total, 61 patients with early and advanced-stage breast and prostate cancer and 31 significant others participated in semi-structured interviews. Using constant comparative analysis, four main types of decisional involvement by significant others were identified: creating a safe place for the patient to make a decision, "becoming a team": collaborative decision-making, moving the patient towards a decision, and making the decision for the patient. Significant others were often found to engage in more than one type of decision involvement as a consequence of several key factors. Within the types of decisional involvement, nine distinct roles in the CAM decision-making process were described by the significant others. The findings of this inquiry extend previous research by highlighting the importance of significant others in cancer patients' CAM decisions and challenge past conceptualizations of autonomy in treatment decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16725245     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  29 in total

1.  Evaluating ambivalence: social-cognitive and affective brain regions associated with ambivalent decision-making.

Authors:  Hannah U Nohlen; Frenk van Harreveld; Mark Rotteveel; Gert-Jan Lelieveld; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  The fertility-related treatment choices of cancer patients: cancer-related infertility and family dynamics.

Authors:  Karrie Ann Snyder; May Kyaw Thazin; William B Pearse; Mehwish Moinuddin
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

3.  Social network bridging potential and the use of complementary and alternative medicine in later life.

Authors:  Alyssa W Goldman; Benjamin Cornwell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26

5.  Determinants of public trust in complementary and alternative medicine.

Authors:  Evelien van der Schee; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Trick or treat? Australian newspaper portrayal of complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Reegan Mercurio; Jaklin Ardath Eliott
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Racial and ethnic variation in partner perspectives about the breast cancer treatment decision-making experience.

Authors:  Sarah E Lillie; Nancy K Janz; Christopher R Friese; John J Graff; Kendra Schwartz; Ann S Hamilton; Brittany Bartol Gay; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Herbal use among cancer patients during palliative or curative chemotherapy treatment in Norway.

Authors:  Silje Engdal; Aslak Steinsbekk; Olbjørn Klepp; Odd Georg Nilsen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  'They're doing surgery on two people': a meta-ethnography of the influences on couples' treatment decision making for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kate Schumm; Zoe Skea; Lorna McKee; James N'Dow
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Addressing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Individuals With Cancer: An Integrative Review and Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lynda G Balneaves; Cody Z Watling; Emilie N Hayward; Brenda Ross; Jill Taylor-Brown; Antony Porcino; Tracy L O Truant
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.