Literature DB >> 16724784

Observer pitch and roll influence: the rod and frame illusion.

Jennifer E Corbett1, James T Enns.   

Abstract

Observers misperceive the orientation of a vertical rod when it is viewed in the context of a tilted frame (the rod and frame illusion, or RFI). The pitch and roll of the surrounding surfaces have independent influences on this illusion (Nelson and Prinzmetal, 2003). Experiment 1 measured the RFI when the pitch and roll of the floor that supported the observer was varied, and the observer was either seated in a chair or standing upright. There were additive influences of pitch and roll on the RFI of seated but not standing observers. Experiments 2 and 3 decoupled body roll and head roll in order to isolate the vestibular and proprioceptive contributions to these effects. The results are interpreted in support of a hierarchy of influence on the RFI: Visual input is given top priority, followed by vestibular input, and then proprioceptive input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16724784     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Antigravity hills are visual illusions.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Luigi Garlaschelli; Monica Barracano
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

2.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields.

Authors:  S E ASCH; H A WITKIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-06

3.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.

Authors:  S E ASCH; H A WITKIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-08

4.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields.

Authors:  H A WITKIN; S E ASCH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-12

5.  The tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D M Beck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Directional sensitivity of stretch reflexes and balance corrections for normal subjects in the roll and pitch planes.

Authors:  M G Carpenter; J H Allum; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Christopher J Bockisch; Nicoletta Caramia; Giovanni Bertolini; Alexander Andrea Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A Bayesian Account of Visual-Vestibular Interactions in the Rod-and-Frame Task.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Anouk J de Brouwer; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-03

3.  Visual capture of gait during redirected walking.

Authors:  Yannick Rothacher; Anh Nguyen; Bigna Lenggenhager; Andreas Kunz; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Perception of Upright: Multisensory Convergence and the Role of Temporo-Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Ariel Winnick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.