Literature DB >> 16723372

A socio-dental approach to assessing children's orthodontic needs.

Sudaduang Gherunpong1, Georgios Tsakos, Aubrey Sheiham.   

Abstract

Traditional methods of assessing orthodontic treatment need using mainly clinical measures are inadequate and would be improved by integrating normative, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and behavioural propensity measures. This study aimed to develop and test a socio-dental system of orthodontic needs assessment, and to compare normative and socio-dental estimates of orthodontic need. The socio-dental system integrates three types of need: normative need (NN), impact-related need (IRN) and propensity-related need (PRN). A cross-sectional survey of all 1,126 children aged 11-12 years in Suphanburi, Thailand, was carried out to test the new system. The dental health component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need was used to assess NN, and the simplified oral hygiene index for oral hygiene status. Oral impacts were assessed using the child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (child-OIDP) index. A self-administered questionnaire recorded information on demographic and oral health-related behaviour. Treatment needs were assessed according to the developed socio-dental system. The socio-dental approach to assess orthodontic needs was easy to use and readily accepted by the children. The estimates of orthodontic need assessed normatively and socio-dentally differed markedly. The prevalence of NN and IRN was 35.0 and 10.5 percent, respectively, thus representing a reduction of approximately 70 percent in the volume of treatment need according to the new method. Children with IRN had different levels of propensity for orthodontic treatment, and therefore required appropriate treatment plans according to their PRN. Of the 10.5 percent with IRN, 6.9 percent had high or medium-high PRN, while 3.6 percent were at medium-low and low levels of propensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16723372     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ).

Authors:  Rosaria Bucci; Roberto Rongo; Eugenio Zito; Angela Galeotti; Rosa Valletta; Vincenzo D'Antò
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Assessment of the quality of measures of child oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Fiona Gilchrist; Helen Rodd; Chris Deery; Zoe Marshman
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Prospective Evaluation of Psychosocial Impact after One Year of Orthodontic Treatment Using PIDAQ Adapted for Indian Population.

Authors:  Kanika Garg; Tulika Tripathi; Priyank Rai; Nandini Sharma; Anup Kanase
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

4.  Social and dental status along the life course and oral health impacts in adolescents: a population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  Karen G Peres; Marco A Peres; Cora L P Araujo; Ana M B Menezes; Pedro C Hallal
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Using associations between oral diseases and oral health-related quality of life in a nationally representative sample to propose oral health goals for 12-year-old children in Thailand.

Authors:  Sudaduang Krisdapong; Piyada Prasertsom; Khanit Rattanarangsima; Supreda Adulyanon; Aubrey Sheiham
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Prevalence, intensity and extent of Oral Impacts on Daily Performances associated with self-perceived malocclusion in 11-12-year-old children.

Authors:  Eduardo Bernabé; Carlos Flores-Mir; Aubrey Sheiham
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Malocclusion, psycho-social impacts and treatment need: A cross-sectional study of Tanzanian primary school-children.

Authors:  Matilda Mtaya; Anne N Astrom; Pongsri Brudvik
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Comparison of the self-administered and interviewer-administered modes of the child-OIDP.

Authors:  Georgios Tsakos; Eduardo Bernabé; Kevin O'Brien; Aubrey Sheiham; Cesar de Oliveira
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Comparison of the discriminative ability of a generic and a condition-specific OHRQoL measure in adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Eduardo Bernabé; Cesar M de Oliveira; Aubrey Sheiham
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Evaluation of orthodontic treatment need by patient-based methods compared with normative method.

Authors:  Imaneh Asgari; Arezoo Ebn Ahmady; Ghasem Yadegarfar; Faezeh Eslamipour
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.