OBJECTIVE: This multinational, multicentre, prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, non-inferiority study compared the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin monotherapy with ofloxacin plus metronidazole in women with uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease. METHODS: Women from hospitals throughout 13 countries received a 14 day course of either oral moxifloxacin, 400 mg once daily (n = 384), or oral ofloxacin, 400 mg twice daily plus oral metronidazole, 500 mg twice daily (n = 365). RESULTS: Of the 741 patients in the intent to treat (ITT) population, 564 (74.2%) were valid for the per protocol (PP) analyses; 112 (19.9%) of these were included in the microbiologically valid population (MBV). Clinical resolution rates in the PP population at the test of cure visit (TOC, 5-24 days post-therapy, primary efficacy end point) were 90.2% (248/275) for moxifloxacin and 90.7% (262/289) for ofloxacin plus metronidazole (95% CI: -5.7% to 4.0%). At follow up (28-42 days post-therapy), resolution rates in the PP population were 85.8% (236/275) and 87.9% (254/289) for moxifloxacin and comparator, respectively (95% CI: -8.0% to 3.1%). Bacteriological success rates in the MBV population at TOC were 87.5% (49/56) for moxifloxacin and 82.1% (46/56) for comparator (95% CI: -8.3% to 18.8%). Against Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, bacteriological success rates with moxifloxacin were 88.5% (23/26) and 100% (13/13) and for comparator 85.7% (18/21) and 81.8% (18/22), respectively. Drug related adverse events occurred less frequently with moxifloxacin (22.5% (85/378)) versus the comparator (30.9% (112/363)) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated PID, once daily moxifloxacin monotherapy was clinically and bacteriologically as efficacious as twice daily ofloxacin plus metronidazole therapy and was associated with fewer drug related adverse events.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This multinational, multicentre, prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, non-inferiority study compared the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin monotherapy with ofloxacin plus metronidazole in women with uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease. METHODS:Women from hospitals throughout 13 countries received a 14 day course of either oral moxifloxacin, 400 mg once daily (n = 384), or oral ofloxacin, 400 mg twice daily plus oral metronidazole, 500 mg twice daily (n = 365). RESULTS: Of the 741 patients in the intent to treat (ITT) population, 564 (74.2%) were valid for the per protocol (PP) analyses; 112 (19.9%) of these were included in the microbiologically valid population (MBV). Clinical resolution rates in the PP population at the test of cure visit (TOC, 5-24 days post-therapy, primary efficacy end point) were 90.2% (248/275) for moxifloxacin and 90.7% (262/289) for ofloxacin plus metronidazole (95% CI: -5.7% to 4.0%). At follow up (28-42 days post-therapy), resolution rates in the PP population were 85.8% (236/275) and 87.9% (254/289) for moxifloxacin and comparator, respectively (95% CI: -8.0% to 3.1%). Bacteriological success rates in the MBV population at TOC were 87.5% (49/56) for moxifloxacin and 82.1% (46/56) for comparator (95% CI: -8.3% to 18.8%). Against Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, bacteriological success rates with moxifloxacin were 88.5% (23/26) and 100% (13/13) and for comparator 85.7% (18/21) and 81.8% (18/22), respectively. Drug related adverse events occurred less frequently with moxifloxacin (22.5% (85/378)) versus the comparator (30.9% (112/363)) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated PID, once daily moxifloxacin monotherapy was clinically and bacteriologically as efficacious as twice daily ofloxacin plus metronidazole therapy and was associated with fewer drug related adverse events.
Authors: Roberta B Ness; David E Soper; Robert L Holley; Jeffrey Peipert; Hugh Randall; Richard L Sweet; Steven J Sondheimer; Susan L Hendrix; Antonio Amortegui; Giuliana Trucco; Thomas Songer; Judith R Lave; Sharon L Hillier; Debra C Bass; Sheryl F Kelsey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kevin A Fenton; Catherine Ison; Alan P Johnson; Elizabeth Rudd; Mehnam Soltani; Iona Martin; Tom Nichols; David M Livermore Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Susan M Sereika; Susan M Foley; Debra C Bass; Roberta B Ness Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Catherine L Haggerty; Roberta B Ness; Antonio Amortegui; Susan L Hendrix; Sharon L Hillier; Robert L Holley; Jeffrey Peipert; Hugh Randall; Steven J Sondheimer; David E Soper; Richard L Sweet; Guiliana Trucco Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Melinda A B Petrina; Lisa A Cosentino; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Toni Darville; Sharon L Hillier Journal: Anaerobe Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 3.331
Authors: Lisa E Manhart; Catherine W Gillespie; M Sylvan Lowens; Christine M Khosropour; Danny V Colombara; Matthew R Golden; Navneet R Hakhu; Katherine K Thomas; James P Hughes; Nicole L Jensen; Patricia A Totten Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 9.079