Literature DB >> 16722923

Does physiotherapy management of low back pain change as a result of an evidence-based educational programme?

Kay Stevenson1, Martyn Lewis, Elaine Hay.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The concept of evidence-based medicine is important in providing efficient health care. The process uses research findings as the basis for clinical decision making. Evidence-based practice helps optimize current health care and enables the practitioners to be suitably accountable for the interventions they provide. Little work has been undertaken to examine how allied health professionals change their clinical practice in light of the latest evidence. The use of opinion leaders to disseminate new evidence around the management of low back pain into practice has been proposed. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate if physiotherapists' clinical management of patients with low back pain would change following an evidence-based education package, which utilized local opinion leaders and delivered the best evidence.
METHOD: Thirty musculoskeletal physiotherapists from a Community Trust in North Staffordshire were cluster randomized by location of work, to two groups. The intervention group received an evidence-based programme on the management of low back pain, including advice regarding increasing activity levels and return to normal activity and challenging patients' fears and beliefs about their pain. The control group received a standard in-service training package on the management of common knee pathologies. The physiotherapists' clinical management of patients with low back pain was measured prior to training and 6 months post training. Outcome measures were based on physiotherapists completing 'discharge summary' questionnaires, which included information relating to the use and importance of therapies for treating their low back pain patients.
RESULTS: There were few significant differences in treatment options between the intervention and control groups post training. Whilst there was some indication that physiotherapists were already utilizing aspects of psychosocial management for patients with low back pain, there was little change in what physiotherapists perceived to be important to patient recovery and actual clinical practice following the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial factors have been identified as an important factor in the recovery of patients with low back pain. This project incorporated the latest evidence on the management of low back pain and utilized the theory of opinion leaders to disseminate this evidence into clinical practice. Whilst there were some limitations in the overall size of the study, the results help to give an insight into the challenges faced by the health care system and researchers alike to ensure quality evidence is actually utilized by practitioners for the benefits of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16722923     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00565.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  33 in total

Review 1.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Elena Parmelli; Gaby Doumit; Melina Gattellari; Mary Ann O'Brien; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-08-10

2.  Predicting intentions to use research evidence for carpal tunnel syndrome treatment decisions among certified hand therapists.

Authors:  Gail N Groth
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12

3.  Interrater Reliability of the Adapted Fresno Test across Multiple Raters.

Authors:  Lucylynn M Lizarondo; Karen Grimmer; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 4.  Translating knowledge in rehabilitation: systematic review.

Authors:  C Allyson Jones; Sanjesh C Roop; Sheri L Pohar; Lauren Albrecht; Shannon D Scott
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-06-05

5.  Has physical therapists' management of musculoskeletal conditions improved over time?

Authors:  Joshua R Zadro; Giovanni Ferreira
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Resolving the Burden of Low Back Pain in Military Service Members and Veterans (RESOLVE): Protocol for a Multisite Pragmatic Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shawn Farrokhi; Elizabeth Russell Esposito; Danielle McPherson; Brittney Mazzone; Rachel Condon; Charity G Patterson; Michael Schneider; Carol M Greco; Anthony Delitto; M Jason Highsmith; Brad D Hendershot; Jason Maikos; Christopher L Dearth
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): A cluster randomised trial protocol.

Authors:  Joanne E McKenzie; Denise A O'Connor; Matthew J Page; Duncan S Mortimer; Simon D French; Bruce F Walker; Jennifer L Keating; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Susan Michie; Jill J Francis; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

Review 9.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions for chronic noncancer pain management.

Authors:  Maria B Ospina; Paul Taenzer; Saifee Rashiq; Joy C MacDermid; Eloise Carr; Dagmara Chojecki; Christa Harstall; James L Henry
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

10.  The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence informed interventions in allied healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaat Goorts; Janine Dizon; Steve Milanese
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.