Literature DB >> 16722631

An integrated in silico 3D model-driven discovery of a novel, potent, and selective amidosulfonamide 5-HT1A agonist (PRX-00023) for the treatment of anxiety and depression.

Oren M Becker1, Dale S Dhanoa, Yael Marantz, Dongli Chen, Sharon Shacham, Srinivasa Cheruku, Alexander Heifetz, Pradyumna Mohanty, Merav Fichman, Anurag Sharadendu, Raphael Nudelman, Michael Kauffman, Silvia Noiman.   

Abstract

We report the discovery of a novel, potent, and selective amidosulfonamide nonazapirone 5-HT1A agonist for the treatment of anxiety and depression, which is now in Phase III clinical trials for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The discovery of 20m (PRX-00023), N-{3-[4-(4-cyclohexylmethanesulfonylaminobutyl)piperazin-1-yl]phenyl}acetamide, and its backup compounds, followed a new paradigm, driving the entire discovery process with in silico methods and seamlessly integrating computational chemistry with medicinal chemistry, which led to a very rapid discovery timeline. The program reached clinical trials within less than 2 years from initiation, spending less than 6 months in lead optimization with only 31 compounds synthesized. In this paper we detail the entire discovery process, which started with modeling the 3D structure of 5-HT1A using the PREDICT methodology, and then performing in silico screening on that structure leading to the discovery of a 1 nM lead compound (8). The lead compound was optimized following a strategy devised based on in silico 3D models and realized through an in silico-driven optimization process, rapidly overcoming selectivity issues (affinity to 5-HT1A vs alpha1-adrenergic receptor) and potential cardiovascular issues (hERG binding), leading to a clinical compound. Finally we report key in vivo preclinical and Phase I clinical data for 20m tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics and show that these favorable results are a direct outcome of the properties that were ascribed to the compound during the rational structure-based discovery process. We believe that this is one of the first examples for a Phase III drug candidate that was discovered and optimized, from start to finish, using in silico model-based methods as the primary tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16722631     DOI: 10.1021/jm0508641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  27 in total

1.  Classification of 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists and antagonists using GA-SVM method.

Authors:  Xue-lian Zhu; Hai-yan Cai; Zhi-jian Xu; Yong Wang; He-yao Wang; Ao Zhang; Wei-liang Zhu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Crystal structure-based virtual screening for fragment-like ligands of the human histamine H(1) receptor.

Authors:  Chris de Graaf; Albert J Kooistra; Henry F Vischer; Vsevolod Katritch; Martien Kuijer; Mitsunori Shiroishi; So Iwata; Tatsuro Shimamura; Raymond C Stevens; Iwan J P de Esch; Rob Leurs
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Computer-aided drug discovery and development (CADDD): in silico-chemico-biological approach.

Authors:  I M Kapetanovic
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 4.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Ligand and structure-based methodologies for the prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor ligands.

Authors:  Stefano Costanzi; Irina G Tikhonova; T Kendall Harden; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Biomolecularmodeling and simulation: a field coming of age.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara; Leif Arthur Halvorsen; Segun Jung; Xia Xiao
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.318

7.  I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction.

Authors:  Ambrish Roy; Alper Kucukural; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  Structural Analysis of Chemokine Receptor-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  Marta Arimont; Shan-Liang Sun; Rob Leurs; Martine Smit; Iwan J P de Esch; Chris de Graaf
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 9.  Protein structure prediction: when is it useful?

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Discovery of novel agonists and antagonists of the free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) using virtual screening.

Authors:  Irina G Tikhonova; Chi Shing Sum; Susanne Neumann; Stanislav Engel; Bruce M Raaka; Stefano Costanzi; Marvin C Gershengorn
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.