Pan Chi1, Hui-ming Lin, Zong-bin Xu. 1. Department of General Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China. cp3169@163.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical complication rate between laparoscopic and open radical resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2000 to December 2005, 491 cases with colorectal cancer were divided into two groups prospectively and nonrandomly,and received radical laparoscopic operation (LP, n=214) and open operation (OP, n=277). The intra- and post-operative complication rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In laparoscopic groups, 14 cases (6.54%,14/214) were converted to open surgery,because of intra-operative complications in 7 cases,obesity or large tumors in 5 cases,narrow- pelvis in one case and retroperitoneal tumor in one case. The intra-operative complication rate was 4.8% (10/207) in LP group and 3.6% (10/277) in OP group (P > 0.05, chi2=0.446). There were no differences in post- operative intestinal obstruction, stoma leak, stoma bleeding, chyle leak, pulmonary infection except incision infection(5.5% vs 14.1%, P< 0.05) between LP and OP groups. The overall postoperative complication rate was 23.5% (47/200) in LP group and 36.8% (102/277) in OP group (P< 0.01, chi2=9.598). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in intra-operative complication rate between LP and OP groups,but the post-operative complication rate is significantly lower in LP group than that in OP group.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical complication rate between laparoscopic and open radical resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2000 to December 2005, 491 cases with colorectal cancer were divided into two groups prospectively and nonrandomly,and received radical laparoscopic operation (LP, n=214) and open operation (OP, n=277). The intra- and post-operative complication rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In laparoscopic groups, 14 cases (6.54%,14/214) were converted to open surgery,because of intra-operative complications in 7 cases,obesity or large tumors in 5 cases,narrow- pelvis in one case and retroperitoneal tumor in one case. The intra-operative complication rate was 4.8% (10/207) in LP group and 3.6% (10/277) in OP group (P > 0.05, chi2=0.446). There were no differences in post- operative intestinal obstruction, stoma leak, stoma bleeding, chyle leak, pulmonary infection except incision infection(5.5% vs 14.1%, P< 0.05) between LP and OP groups. The overall postoperative complication rate was 23.5% (47/200) in LP group and 36.8% (102/277) in OP group (P< 0.01, chi2=9.598). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in intra-operative complication rate between LP and OP groups,but the post-operative complication rate is significantly lower in LP group than that in OP group.