Literature DB >> 16721530

Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone.

Shinji Tetsumura1, Akifumi Fujita, Mikio Nakajima, Muneaki Abe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fixation strength of the hamstring tendon graft on the tibial side is considered the weak point in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of four types of ACL reconstruction methods on the tibial side.
METHODS: Extensor digitorum tendons harvested from fresh bovine forelimbs were used as the graft materials in this study. Twenty-eight porcine tibias were divided into four groups based on different fixation methods. Group D was fixed using a double spike plate (DSP), group I was fixed using an interference screw, group DI-80 was fixed using both an interference screw and DSP (80 N tension was applied to DSP), and group DI-150 was fixed using both an interference screw and DSP (150 N tension was applied to DSP).
RESULTS: The displacement of the grafts in response to 500 cycles of 0-150 N loading was significantly greater in groups D (10.3 +/- 15 mm) and I (5.5 +/- 1.7 mm) than that in groups DI-80 (2.1 +/- 0.3 mm) and DI-150 (1.2 +/- 0.4 mm), with no significant differences between groups DI-80 and DI-150. The ultimate failure load and stiffness were significantly higher in groups DI-80 (745 +/- 156 N, 103 +/- 17 N/mm) and DI-150 (801 +/- 129 N, 151 +/- 35 N/mm) than those in groups D (374 +/- 53 N, 70 +/- 13 N/mm), and I (520 +/- 76 N, 78 +/- 18 N/mm). The stiffness of group DI-150 was significantly greater than that of group DI-80.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the initial fixation strength of the hamstring tendon can be increased by using an interference screw combined with DSP on the tibial side.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16721530     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-006-1016-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  11 in total

1.  The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro.

Authors:  Camilla Halewood; Michael T Hirschmann; Simon Newman; Jaffar Hleihil; Gershon Chaimski; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Stefano Soderi; Luigi Sirleo; Giovanni Munz; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparative Analysis of Arthroscopic Tight Rope ACL Reconstruction Using four Strand Isolated Semitendinosus Graft and Quadrupled Combined Hamstring Graft.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar; Dushyant Chouhan; Amit Narang; Mukesh Kalra; Ranjeet Choudhary; Ankush Kumar
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-05

4.  Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone.

Authors:  Andrzej Brzezinski; Casey Imbergamo; William Pfaff; Rae Tarapore; Matthew Nasra; Michael Simon; Charles Gatt
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Comparison of bioabsorbable suture anchor fixation on the tibial side for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using free soft tissue graft: experimental laboratory study on porcine bone.

Authors:  Myung Ku Kim; Suk In Na; Jong Min Lee; Ju Yong Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  A comparison of the fixation strengths provided by different intraosseous tendon lengths during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in a porcine tibial model.

Authors:  Dong-Lyul Yang; Sang-Ho Cheon; Chang-Wug Oh; Hee-Soo Kyung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-05-16

7.  Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Wedge Locking Plate in a Porcine Tibial Model.

Authors:  Jeong-Ku Ha; Chul Hyun Yeom; Ho Su Jang; Han Eui Song; Sung Jae Lee; Kang Hee Kim; Kyu Sung Chung; Mahendar Gururaj Bhat; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-11-04

8.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Tibial Attachment Preserving Hamstring Graft without Implant on Tibial Side.

Authors:  Skand Sinha; Ananta Kumar Naik; Mridul Maheshwari; Sumedh Sandanshiv; Durgashankar Meena; Rajendra K Arya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Fixation of the Anterior Ligament Graft at the Tibial Pole: Biomechanical Analysis of Three Methods.

Authors:  Fernando Pessoa Weiss; Felipe Augusto de Aguiar Possoli; Isabel Ziesemer Costa; Paulo César Borges; Edmar Stieven Filho; Luiz Fernando Kubrusly
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-12-13

10.  Investigation of Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation for the Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament using Interference Screw Merely or in Combination with Supplementary Staple: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sayed Hamid Mousavi; Omid Masoumi; Hossein Akbariaghdam; Ghasem Mohammadsharifi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2020-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.