Literature DB >> 16721394

Dose-response study of probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp paracasei CRL-341 in healthy young adults.

C N Larsen1, S Nielsen, P Kaestel, E Brockmann, M Bennedsen, H R Christensen, D C Eskesen, B L Jacobsen, K F Michaelsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate the dose-response effects of supplementation with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis (BB-12) and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp paracasei (CRL-431) on blood lipids, recovery from feces and bowel habits. Changes of the fecal microflora was analyzed in the 10(10) CFU/day probiotic and placebo group.
DESIGN: The study was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel dose-response study.
SUBJECTS: Healthy young adults (18-40 years) were recruited by advertising in local newspapers. Of the 75 persons enrolled, 71 (46 women, 25 men, mean age 25.6 years (range 18-40 years)) completed the study. INTERVENTION: The volunteers were randomly assigned into five groups receiving either placebo or a mixture of the two probiotics in the concentration of 10(8), 10(9), 10(10) or 10(11) CFU/day in 2 weeks run-in period, 3 weeks intervention and 2 weeks wash-out. Diary reporting bowel habits and well being (abdominal bloating, flatulence and headache) was kept for all 7 weeks and blood lipids, fecal recovery of BB-12 and CRL-431, as well as fecal microflora was tested before, immediately and 2 weeks after intervention.
RESULTS: The fecal recovery of BB-12 increased significantly (P < 0.001) with increasing dose. In the group receiving 10(11) CFU/day BB-12 was recovered from 13 out of 15 volunteers. CRL-431 was not recovered in any of the fecal samples. Supplementation with probiotics did not change the fecal bacterial composition. A significant linear increase in fecal consistency (looser stool) with increasing probiotic dose (P = 0.018) was observed. No overall dose-response effect was found on the blood lipids. High doses of probiotics were well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: A dose-related recovery of BB-12 from feces was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16721394     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  35 in total

1.  Effect of a synbiotic yogurt on levels of fecal bifidobacteria, clostridia, and enterobacteria.

Authors:  Amrita Palaria; Ivy Johnson-Kanda; Daniel J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A comparison of two probiotic strains of bifidobacteria in premature infants.

Authors:  Mark A Underwood; Karen M Kalanetra; Nicholas A Bokulich; Zachery T Lewis; Majid Mirmiran; Daniel J Tancredi; David A Mills
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 3.  Gut microbiota role in irritable bowel syndrome: New therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Eleonora Distrutti; Lorenzo Monaldi; Patrizia Ricci; Stefano Fiorucci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Complete genome sequence of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, a widely consumed probiotic strain.

Authors:  Christel Garrigues; Eric Johansen; Martin B Pedersen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei LC01 positively modulates intestinal microflora in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jing Sun; Xianting Liu; Chuan Hong; Yuanbo Zhu; Aiping Liu; Siqi Li; Huiyuan Guo; Fazheng Ren
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Bifidobacterium animalis causes extensive duodenitis and mild colonic inflammation in monoassociated interleukin-10-deficient mice.

Authors:  James P Moran; Jens Walter; Gerald W Tannock; Susan L Tonkonogy; R Balfour Sartor
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.325

7.  Survival of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the human gastrointestinal tract with daily consumption of a low-fat probiotic spread.

Authors:  Yvonne E M Dommels; Robèr A Kemperman; Yvonne E M P Zebregs; René B Draaisma; Arne Jol; Danielle A W Wolvers; Elaine E Vaughan; Ruud Albers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte beta-defensin 2.

Authors:  M Schlee; J Harder; B Köten; E F Stange; J Wehkamp; K Fellermann
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics.

Authors:  Ralf Jäger; Alex E Mohr; Katie C Carpenter; Chad M Kerksick; Martin Purpura; Adel Moussa; Jeremy R Townsend; Manfred Lamprecht; Nicholas P West; Katherine Black; Michael Gleeson; David B Pyne; Shawn D Wells; Shawn M Arent; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Richard B Kreider; Bill I Campbell; Laurent Bannock; Jonathan Scheiman; Craig J Wissent; Marco Pane; Douglas S Kalman; Jamie N Pugh; Jessica A Ter Haar; Jose Antonio
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Gut Balance, a synbiotic supplement, increases fecal Lactobacillus paracasei but has little effect on immunity in healthy physically active individuals.

Authors:  Nicholas P West; David B Pyne; Allan W Cripps; Claus T Christophersen; Michael A Conlon; Peter A Fricker
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2012-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.