Literature DB >> 16721271

Comparison of blood pressure and thermal responses in rats exposed to millimeter wave energy or environmental heat.

Nancy J Millenbaugh1, Johnathan L Kiel, Kathy L Ryan, Robert V Blystone, John E Kalns, Becky J Brott, Cesario Z Cerna, William S Lawrence, Laura L Soza, Patrick A Mason.   

Abstract

Electromagnetic fields at millimeter wave lengths are being developed for commercial and military use at power levels that can cause temperature increases in the skin. Previous work suggests that sustained exposure to millimeter waves causes greater heating of skin, leading to faster induction of circulatory failure than exposure to environmental heat (EH). We tested this hypothesis in three separate experiments by comparing temperature changes in skin, subcutis, and colon, and the time to reach circulatory collapse (mean arterial blood pressure, 20 mmHg) in male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to the following conditions that produced similar rates of body core heating within each experiment: (1) EH at 42 degrees C, 35 GHz at 75 mW/cm, or 94 GHz at 75 mW/cm under ketamine and xylazine anesthesia; (2) EH at 43 degrees C, 35 GHz at 90 mW/cm, or 94 GHz at 90 mW/cm under ketamine and xylazine anesthesia; and (3) EH at 42 degrees C, 35 GHz at 90 mW/cm, or 94 GHz at 75 mW/cm under isoflurane anesthesia. In all three experiments, the rate and amount of temperature increase at the subcutis and skin surface differed significantly in the rank order of 94 GHz more than 35 GHz more than EH. The time to reach circulatory collapse was significantly less only for rats exposed to 94 GHz at 90 mW/cm, the group with the greatest rate of skin and subcutis heating of all groups in this study, compared with both the 35 GHz at 90 mW/cm and the EH at 43 degrees C groups. These data indicate that body core heating is the major determinant of induction of hemodynamic collapse, and the influence of heating of the skin and subcutis becomes significant only when a certain threshold rate of heating of these tissues is exceeded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16721271     DOI: 10.1097/01.shk.0000209550.11087.fd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  2 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Electromagnetic Shielding Fabric, Wave-Absorbing Fabric and Wave-Transparent Fabric.

Authors:  Jianjun Yin; Wensuo Ma; Zuobin Gao; Xianqing Lei; Chenhui Jia
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 2.  5G Wireless Communication and Health Effects-A Pragmatic Review Based on Available Studies Regarding 6 to 100 GHz.

Authors:  Myrtill Simkó; Mats-Olof Mattsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.