Literature DB >> 16719877

Oral sedation with midazolam and diphenhydramine compared with midazolam alone in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Mustafa Cengiz1, Zeynep Baysal, Suleyman Ganidagli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of oral midazolam and midazolam-diphenhydramine combination to sedate children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study in 96 children who were randomly allocated into two groups. Group D received oral diphenhydramine (1.25 mg x kg(-1)) with midazolam (0.5 mg x kg(-1)), and Group P received oral placebo with midazolam (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) alone. Sedation scores, onset and duration of sleep were evaluated. Adverse effects, including hypoxemia, failed sedation, and the return of baseline activity, were documented.
RESULTS: Diphenhydramine facilitated an earlier onset of midazolam sedation (P < 0.01), and higher sedation scores (P < 0.01). In children who received midazolam alone, 20 (41%) were inadequately sedated, compared with 9 (18%) children who received midazolam and diphenhydramine combination (P < 0.01). Time to complete recovery was not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the combination of oral diphenhydramine with oral midazolam resulted in safe and effective sedation for children undergoing MRI. The use of this combination might be more advantageous compared with midazolam alone, resulting in less sedation failure during MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16719877     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01820.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  8 in total

1.  MRI Customized Play Therapy in Children Reduces the Need for Sedation--A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Bhavneet Bharti; Prahbhjot Malhi; N Khandelwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Value of fetal cerebral MRI in sonographically proven cardiac rhabdomyoma.

Authors:  Matthias R Mühler; Annett Rake; Michael Schwabe; Susanne Schmidt; Dietmar Kivelitz; Rabih Chaoui; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-03-15

3.  Application of magnetic resonance urography in diagnosis of congenital urogenital anomalies in children.

Authors:  Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Parisa Saeedi; Zhina Sadeghi; Azadeh Elmi; Mehrzad Mehdizadeh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Non-Intravenous Sedatives and Analgesics for Procedural Sedation for Imaging Procedures in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Amber Thomas; Jamie L Miller; Kevin Couloures; Peter N Johnson
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

5.  Assessing renal function in children with hydronephrosis - additional feature of MR urography.

Authors:  George Hadjidekov; Savina Hadjidekova; Zahari Tonchev; Rumiana Bakalova; Ichio Aoki
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  The Comparison between Effect of Chloralhydrate and Diphenhydramine on Sedating for Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Afagh Hassanzadeh Rad; Vahid Aminzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2016

7.  Using intranasal dexmedetomidine with buccal midazolam for magnetic resonance imaging sedation in children: A single-arm prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Bi Lian Li; Hao Luo; Jun Xiang Huang; Huan Huan Zhang; Joanna R Paquin; Vivian M Yuen; Xing Rong Song
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.569

8.  Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hassan Barzegari; Behzad Zohrevandi; Kambiz Masoumi; Arash Forouzan; Ali Asgari Darian; Shaqayeq Khosravi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.