Literature DB >> 16718622

Is the anatomical protrusion on the posterior hypopharyngeal wall associated with cadavers of only the elderly?

Shengchun Xu1, Lili Tu, Qin Wang, Ming Zhang.   

Abstract

Cricopharyngeal bars are commonly seen on a barium swallow radiologic examination and represent the failure of the cricopharyngeus to relax. Traditionally, the bars have been considered as functional or physiologic protrusions. Recently, anatomical cricopharyngeal protrusion has been found in about 30% of cadavers of the elderly, suggesting that such a structural change may become a physical barrier that affects the normal deglutition in a living person. This suggests that such a radiographic finding should be carefully considered when interpreting radiologic and manometrical examinations and managing dysphagia of the elderly. However, the finding of the anatomical cricopharyngeal protrusion was based on the observation of cadavers of the elderly (mean age = 77 years). The aim of this study was to further investigate whether such an anatomical cricopharyngeal protrusion exists in cadavers of other ages. Using the dissection method, we examined 63 human cadavers that were divided into three age groups: young adult (6 females and 10 males, age = 16-24 years old), adult (8 females and 23 males, age = 25-64 years old), and early elderly (5 females and 11 males, age = 65-69 years old). We found that 57 of the 63 cadavers had a smooth mucosal surface on the posterior hypopharyngeal and upper esophageal wall. A slightly thickened posterior muscular wall was observed at the cricoid level in six cadavers (five from the adult group and one from the early elderly group), but its boundary was not clearly identified. Taking the previous reports together, our results suggest that an anatomical cricopharyngeal protrusion is closely associated with the aging process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16718622     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-006-9024-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  12 in total

1.  Variations in the roentgen appearance of the esophageal lip.

Authors:  T L SIEBERT; J STEIN; M H POPPEL
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1959-04

2.  Aging-related alterations in human upper esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  S R Fulp; C B Dalton; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Disorders of pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter motor function.

Authors:  W J Kilman; R K Goyal
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1976-05

4.  Cineroentgenographic observations of the cricopharyngeus.

Authors:  W B Seaman
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1966-04

Review 5.  Pharyngoesophageal swallowing disorders and the pharyngoesophageal sphincter.

Authors:  J Hellemans; W Pelemans; G Vantrappen
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.456

6.  An anatomical protrusion exists on the posterior hypopharyngeal wall in some elderly cadavers.

Authors:  Matthew Leaper; Ming Zhang; Patrick J D Dawes
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Biomechanics of cricopharyngeal bars.

Authors:  R O Dantas; I J Cook; W J Dodds; M K Kern; I M Lang; J G Brasseur
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The pharyngoesophageal sphincter.

Authors:  C Zaino; H G Jacobson; H Lepow; C Ozturk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Comparison of upper esophageal sphincter opening in healthy asymptomatic young and elderly volunteers.

Authors:  M Kern; E Bardan; R Arndorfer; C Hofmann; J Ren; R Shaker
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 10.  Functional anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  D V Sivarao; R K Goyal
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-03-06       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.