Literature DB >> 16717328

Failure to recognize loss of incoming data in an anesthesia record-keeping system may have increased medical liability.

Michael M Vigoda1, David A Lubarsky.   

Abstract

Automated anesthesia record-keeping systems (AARKs) are increasingly being used. There is a perception that AARKs may limit medical liability. We report a case in which our AARK may have increased our medical liability exposure. Nine months after a patient suffered a serious intraoperative complication, the anesthesiologist was named (as one of several defendants) in a claim alleging failure to properly monitor anesthetic care. One reason why the anesthesiologist was named related to a gap of 93 min in which no vital signs were documented in the anesthesia record. Relying on the physiological monitors to assess the patient's condition, the anesthesiologist did not recognize the interruption of data transmission, because the "active" medication window obscured the graphical display of the vital sign window.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16717328     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000217235.25350.5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

1.  Anesthesia recordkeeping: accuracy of recall with computerized and manual entry recordkeeping.

Authors:  Thomas Corey Davis; Jeffrey A Green; Alexander Colquhoun; Brenda L Hage; Chuck Biddle
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Using Visual Analytics to Determine the Utilization of Preoperative Anesthesia Assessments.

Authors:  J P Wanderer; C L Gruss; J M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Will Real-Time Monitoring Technology be a Game Changer for Perfusion Safety?

Authors:  Linda B Mongero
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 6.  Anesthesia information management systems: a review of functionality and installation considerations.

Authors:  Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Mohamed A Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Automatic notifications mediated by anesthesia information management systems reduce the frequency of prolonged gaps in blood pressure documentation.

Authors:  Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard H Epstein; Stephen Bader; Sachin Kheterpal; Warren S Sandberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Peri-Operative Anaesthetic Documentation: A Report of Three Sequential Audits on the Quality of Outcomes, with an Insight Into Surrounding Legal Issues.

Authors:  William Brett Curtis; Rajesh Sethi; Thavarajah Visvanathan; Swati Sethi
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-09-04

9.  Adequate interval for the monitoring of vital signs during endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  J Y Min; H I Kim; S J Park; H Lim; J H Song; H J Byon
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Amalgamation of management information system into anaesthesiology practice: A boon for the modern anaesthesiologists.

Authors:  Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.