Literature DB >> 16717185

A missing model in reproductive skew theory: the bordered tug-of-war.

Hudson Kern Reeve1, Sheng-Feng Shen.   

Abstract

Models of reproductive skew can be classified into two groups: transactional models, in which group members yield shares of reproduction to each other in return for cooperation, and tug-of-war models, in which group members invest group resources in a tug-of-war over their respective reproductive shares. We synthesize these two models to yield a "bordered tug-of-war" model in which the internal tug-of-war is limited ("bordered") by the requirement that group members must achieve a certain amount of reproduction lest they pursue a noncooperative option leading to group breakup. Previous attempts to synthesize these two models did not allow for the fact that the tug-of-war will affect group output, which in turn feeds back on the reproductive payments required by group members to remain cooperative. The bordered tug-of-war model, which does not assume complete reproductive control by any individual and allows for conflict within groups, predicts that the degree of within-group selfishness will increase as the noncooperative options become less attractive, e.g., as ecological constraints on solitary breeding increase. When the noncooperative option involves fighting for the group resource (e.g., territory) and leaving if the fight is lost, the subordinate's overall share of reproduction is predicted to be independent of its relatedness to the dominant and to increase the greater its probability of winning the fight, the less the value of the territory, and the greater its personal payoff for leaving. The unique predictions of the bordered tug-of-war model may fit skew data from a number of species, including meerkats, lions, and wood mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16717185      PMCID: PMC1482509          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603005103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  A Transactional Theory of Within-Group Conflict.

Authors:  Hudson K Reeve
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Tests of reproductive-skew models in social insects.

Authors:  H K Reeve; L Keller
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Egalitarianism in female African lions.

Authors:  C Packer; A E Pusey; L E Eberly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; P N Brotherton; A F Russell; M J O'Riain; D Gaynor; R Kansky; A Griffin; M Manser; L Sharpe; G M McIlrath; T Small; A Moss; S Monfort
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  Stress hormones and sociality: integrating social and environmental stressors.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolutionarily stable investments in recognition systems explain patterns of discrimination failure and success.

Authors:  Michael J Sheehan; H Kern Reeve
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Concessions of an alpha male? Cooperative defence and shared reproduction in multi-male primate groups.

Authors:  Noah Snyder-Mackler; Susan C Alberts; Thore J Bergman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Reproductive partitioning and the assumptions of reproductive skew models in the cooperatively breeding American crow.

Authors:  Andrea K Townsend; Anne B Clark; Kevin J McGowan; Irby J Lovette
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Reproductive control via eviction (but not the threat of eviction) in banded mongooses.

Authors:  Michael A Cant; Sarah J Hodge; Matthew B V Bell; Jason S Gilchrist; Hazel J Nichols
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Costly reproductive competition between females in a monogamous cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Martha J Nelson-Flower; Philip A R Hockey; Colleen O'Ryan; Sinead English; Alex M Thompson; Katharine Bradley; Rebecca Rose; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Reproductive skew in female common marmosets: what can proximate mechanisms tell us about ultimate causes?

Authors:  Wendy Saltzman; Leslie J Digby; David H Abbott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Two experimental tests of the relationship between group stability and aggressive conflict in Polistes wasps.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Hudson Kern Reeve
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-01-09

9.  Who cries wolf, and when? Manipulation of perceived threats to preserve rank in cooperative groups.

Authors:  Pat Barclay; Stephen Benard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intergenerational conflicts may help explain parental absence effects on reproductive timing: a model of age at first birth in humans.

Authors:  Cristina Moya; Rebecca Sear
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.