Literature DB >> 16717005

Patient safety in outpatient surgery: the viewpoint of the healthcare providers.

P Carayon1, A Schoofs Hundt, C J Alvarado, S R Springman, P Ayoub.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to understand the viewpoint of healthcare providers with regard to patient safety in outpatient surgery settings. Two methods were used to gather data from the healthcare providers: (1) questionnaire with open-ended questions about six predefined stages of the patient care process; (2) survey with closed questions. With the first method, the main quality and safety of care issues concerned communication to patients, coordination of reports and forms, patient and staff time pressures and standards of care. The first two stages of the outpatient surgery process, i.e. patient work-up prior to day of surgery and patient admission and preparation on the day of surgery, yielded many more comments than the other four stages. The results of the structured questionnaire show that, overall, the healthcare providers report high quality of care provided by themselves (98%) and their surgery centre (96%). With regard to patient safety (i.e. cancellations of surgeries, patient safety problems and serious mistakes), there was a clear difference in perceptions reported by the physicians vs. the nurses and other staff. Nurses and other staff were more likely to report patient safety problems than physicians. The combination of qualitative data from the initial questionnaire and the quantitative data from the structured questionnaire provides a rather complete view of the outpatient surgery staff perceptions of quality and safety of care. This research highlights the importance of getting input from the healthcare providers regarding the quality and safety of care rather than relying only on traditional measures about patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16717005     DOI: 10.1080/00140130600568717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

1.  Sociotechnical systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Work       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.

Authors:  P Carayon; A Schoofs Hundt; B-T Karsh; A P Gurses; C J Alvarado; M Smith; P Flatley Brennan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

3.  Patient source of learning about health technologies and ratings of trust in technologies used in their care.

Authors:  Enid Montague
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The effects of Computerized Provider Order Entry implementation on communication in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Peter L T Hoonakker; Pascale Carayon; James M Walker; Roger L Brown; Randi S Cartmill
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Worklife and satisfaction of hospitalists: toward flourishing careers.

Authors:  Keiki Hinami; Chad T Whelan; Robert J Wolosin; Joseph A Miller; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Development and Psychometric Qualities of the SEIPS Survey to Evaluate CPOE/EHR Implementation in ICUs.

Authors:  Peter L T Hoonakker; Randi S Cartmill; Pascale Carayon; James M Walker
Journal:  Int J Healthc Inf Syst Inform       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 7.  A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Sarah Kianfar; Yaqiong Li; Anping Xie; Bashar Alyousef; Abigail Wooldridge
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Peter Hoonakker; Richard Holden; Ayse P Gurses
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Rationale and design of the Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS).

Authors:  Amanda H Salanitro; Sunil Kripalani; Joanne Resnic; Stephanie K Mueller; Tosha B Wetterneck; Katherine Taylor Haynes; Jason Stein; Peter J Kaboli; Stephanie Labonville; Edward Etchells; Daniel J Cobaugh; David Hanson; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Mark V Williams; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review.

Authors:  France Légaré; David Moher; Glyn Elwyn; Annie LeBlanc; Karine Gravel
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.