Literature DB >> 16716977

Treatment and outcome in pancreatic pseudocysts.

Bodil Andersson1, Emma Nilsson, Julian Willner, Roland Andersson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic pseudocyst is a common complication of both acute and chronic pancreatitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of different treatment regimens.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients > or =15 years of age admitted to Lund University Hospital from 1994 to 2003 with pancreatic pseudocysts were analysed retrospectively. Pseudocysts were defined according to the Atlanta classification.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients (29 M (66%), mean age 55+/-14 years) were included in the study, and all were subjected to treatment on 88 occasions. Mean size of pseudocysts at diagnosis was 9.6+/-6.8 cm (1.5-40 cm). Recurrence after treatment was 1.0+/-1.1 times (range 0-4). No difference was found in recurrence rate or pseudocyst size when comparing conservative versus interventional treatment, but patient weight was higher (p=0.013) and acute pancreatitis was more frequent (p=0.046) in conservatively treated patients. Surgical treatment tended to be associated with a lower recurrence rate as compared with percutaneous treatments. The rate of hospital admissions was a median 3 (0-16) and median length of stay (LOS) was 12 days (0-141 days). Six patients (14%) had complications and 3 died (7%). Pseudocysts > or =8 cm did not differ significantly from smaller pseudocysts regarding the choice of conservative treatment, LOS, recurrence and gastrointestinal obstruction, but there was a trend towards more complications in the group with larger pseudocysts (5 versus 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pancreatic pseudocysts require frequent hospital admissions and repeated treatments. Larger pseudocysts do not imply more recurrences. The lowest recurrence rate overall was seen after open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16716977     DOI: 10.1080/00365520500442690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  8 in total

1.  Acute pancreatitis--from cellular signalling to complicated clinical course.

Authors:  Roland Andersson; Bodil Andersson; Ellen Andersson; Jakob Axelsson; Gunilla Eckerwall; Bobby Tingstedt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts offers similar success and complications compared to surgical treatment but with a lower cost.

Authors:  Angela Saul; Miguel Angel Ramirez Luna; Carlos Chan; Luis Uscanga; Francisco Valdovinos Andraca; Jorge Hernandez Calleros; Javier Elizondo; Felix Tellez Avila
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Pancreatic pseudocyst.

Authors:  Samir Habashi; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Surgical and interventional management of complications caused by acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Feza Y Karakayali
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pancreatic pseudocyst: therapeutic dilemma.

Authors:  A K Khanna; Satyendra K Tiwary; Puneet Kumar
Journal:  Int J Inflam       Date:  2012-04-17

6.  Outcomes of a single-step endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections using an electrocautery-enhanced coaxial lumen-apposing, self-expanding metal stent with and without fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Babatunde Olaiya; Parit Mekaroonkamol; Bai-Wen Li; Julia Massaad; Cicily T Vachaparambil; Jennifer Xu; Vladamir Lamm; Hui Luo; Shan-Shan Shen; Hui-Min Chen; Steve Keilin; Field F Willingham; Qiang Cai
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2020-06-04

7.  Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a 14-year experience from a tertiary hepatobiliary centre.

Authors:  Margaret G Keane; Shun Fung Sze; Natascha Cieplik; Sam Murray; Gavin J Johnson; George J Webster; Douglas Thorburn; Stephen P Pereira
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparative evaluation of two porcine ex vivo models for training in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.

Authors:  Frederick Moryoussef; Sarah Leblanc; Alice Bertucat; Arthur Laquiere; Emmanuel Coron; Luigi Mangialavori; Jean-Christophe Duchmann; Yann Le Baleur; Frederic Prat
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-10-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.