Literature DB >> 16716151

The impact of immunosuppression on erythema migrans. A retrospective study of clinical presentation, response to treatment and production of Borrelia antibodies in 33 patients.

B Fürst1, M Glatz, H Kerl, R R Müllegger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the potential influence of immunosuppression on erythema migrans, the hallmark of early Lyme borreliosis.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to assess the impact of immunosuppression on erythema migrans in 33 patients with a malignant or autoimmune disease, chronic infection, or immunosuppressive therapy for organ transplantation. Only patients with active disease status and/or current immunosuppressive therapy were included. Pre-treatment clinical parameters, such as presentation of the skin lesion and presence of extracutaneous signs and symptoms, the disease course during a median follow-up of 9 months after therapy and serum anti-Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies before therapy and by the end of follow-up in the 33 immunosuppressed patients were statistically compared with 75 otherwise healthy patients with erythema migrans. The 75 control patients were matched for sex, age and antibiotic therapy.
RESULTS: With the exception of the site of erythema migrans lesions, which were found more often on the trunk than on the legs in the immunosuppressed patients (vice versa in immunocompetent patients), we found no significant differences for all investigated parameters between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that immunosuppression does not influence clinical presentation, response to therapy, or production of anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies of patients with erythema migrans. It is thus not necessary to treat immunosuppressed patients with erythema migrans differently from immunocompetent patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16716151     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0307-6938            Impact factor:   3.470


  7 in total

1.  Smear Campaign: Misattribution of Pancytopenia to a Tick-Borne Illness.

Authors:  Jessica Lee; Soraya Azzawi; Michael J Peluso; Aaron Richterman; Haiyan Ramirez Batlle; Maria A Yialamas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Lyme neuroborreliosis in a patient treated with TNF-alpha inhibitor.

Authors:  Maja Ivartnik Merkac; Janez Tomazic; Franc Strle
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Seronegative lyme neuroborreliosis in a patient using rituximab.

Authors:  Willemijn Alexandra van Dop; Marie-José Kersten; Bob de Wever; Joppe Willem Hovius
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-14

Review 4.  Management of Lyme Disease in European Children: a Review for Practical Purpose.

Authors:  Matteo D'Alessandro; Anna Loy; Elio Castagnola
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 5.  Severe course of Lyme neuroborreliosis in an HIV-1 positive patient; case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Nathalie D van Burgel; Mayke Oosterloo; Frank P Kroon; Alje P van Dam
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Early Lyme Borreliosis in Patients Treated with Tumour Necrosis Factor-Alfa Inhibitors.

Authors:  Vera Maraspin; Petra Bogovič; Tereza Rojko; Katarina Ogrinc; Eva Ružić-Sabljić; Franc Strle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Lyme carditis in an immunocompromised patient.

Authors:  Matthew F Ryan; Coben Thorn
Journal:  Case Rep Emerg Med       Date:  2013-08-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.