Literature DB >> 16716124

Decision making in antifungal monotherapy versus combination therapy.

Russell E Lewis1.   

Abstract

The availability of new antifungal agents with novel mechanisms of action and improved tolerability has widened the possibilities for combination therapy for difficult-to-treat opportunistic mycoses. However, empiricism largely governs this therapy, especially in patients with invasive mould infections for whom there is a dire need to improve outcomes. Because of difficulties associated with the design and conduct of clinical trials of combination therapy for opportunistic mycoses, most studies are still performed in the laboratory or in animal models. Methods to assess combined antifungal effects in vitro and in animals are poorly standardized, and little evidence suggests that the data generated from these studies are relevant to treating patients. Even without solid evidence to support routine combination therapy, certain principles can guide its use in select patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16716124     DOI: 10.1592/phco.26.6part2.61S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  3 in total

1.  When and how to cover for fungal infections in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Nicolas Allou; Jerome Allyn; Philippe Montravers
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Use of Antifungal Combination Therapy: Agents, Order, and Timing.

Authors:  Melissa D Johnson; John R Perfect
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2010-05-01

3.  Combination antifungal therapy: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Baldeep Wirk; John R Wingard
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.725

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.