OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to evaluate whether CT scans could be used to differentiate hepatic venoocclusive disease from hepatic graft-versus-host disease in patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 18 patients (eight women, 10 men; mean age, 42.4 years) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with biopsy-proven hepatic venoocclusive disease (n = 5), hepatic graft-versus-host disease (n = 6), or both (n = 7). Two radiologists reviewed abdominal and pelvic CT scans for hepatomegaly (> 18 cm), splenomegaly (> 13 cm), size of main portal and right hepatic veins, presence of periportal edema, gallbladder wall edema, hydropic gallbladder, ascites, and small-bowel wall thickening. CT and histopathology findings were correlated using analysis of variance and Fisher-Free-man-Holton tests. RESULTS: Ascites and periportal edema were present in all five patients with venoocclusive disease, but of six patients with graft-versus-host disease, ascites was seen in two (p < 0.05) and periportal edema in only one (p < 0.05). Small-bowel wall thickening was encountered in five patients with graft-versus-host disease and in none with venoocclusive disease (p < 0.05). The right hepatic vein diameter in patients with venoocclusive disease (mean, 0.27 cm) was significantly smaller than the right hepatic vein diameter in patients with graft-versus-host disease (mean, 0.87 cm; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CT findings of periportal edema, ascites, and a narrow right hepatic vein suggest venoocclusive disease rather than graft-versus-host disease. Small-bowel wall thickening suggests graft-versus-host disease.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to evaluate whether CT scans could be used to differentiate hepatic venoocclusive disease from hepatic graft-versus-host disease in patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 18 patients (eight women, 10 men; mean age, 42.4 years) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with biopsy-proven hepatic venoocclusive disease (n = 5), hepatic graft-versus-host disease (n = 6), or both (n = 7). Two radiologists reviewed abdominal and pelvic CT scans for hepatomegaly (> 18 cm), splenomegaly (> 13 cm), size of main portal and right hepatic veins, presence of periportal edema, gallbladder wall edema, hydropic gallbladder, ascites, and small-bowel wall thickening. CT and histopathology findings were correlated using analysis of variance and Fisher-Free-man-Holton tests. RESULTS:Ascites and periportal edema were present in all five patients with venoocclusive disease, but of six patients with graft-versus-host disease, ascites was seen in two (p < 0.05) and periportal edema in only one (p < 0.05). Small-bowel wall thickening was encountered in five patients with graft-versus-host disease and in none with venoocclusive disease (p < 0.05). The right hepatic vein diameter in patients with venoocclusive disease (mean, 0.27 cm) was significantly smaller than the right hepatic vein diameter in patients with graft-versus-host disease (mean, 0.87 cm; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CT findings of periportal edema, ascites, and a narrow right hepatic vein suggest venoocclusive disease rather than graft-versus-host disease. Small-bowel wall thickening suggests graft-versus-host disease.
Authors: Eun Mi Kim; Hyeon Je Cho; Chong Rae Cho; Yee Gyung Kwak; Mi Young Kim; Yun Ku Cho Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: M Mohty; F Malard; M Abecassis; E Aerts; A S Alaskar; M Aljurf; M Arat; P Bader; F Baron; A Bazarbachi; D Blaise; F Ciceri; S Corbacioglu; J-H Dalle; F Dignan; T Fukuda; A Huynh; T Masszi; M Michallet; A Nagler; M NiChonghaile; S Okamoto; A Pagliuca; C Peters; F B Petersen; P G Richardson; T Ruutu; B N Savani; E Wallhult; I Yakoub-Agha; R F Duarte; E Carreras Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 5.483