Literature DB >> 16714616

MRI of coronary vessel walls using radial k-space sampling and steady-state free precession imaging.

Marcus Katoh1, Elmar Spuentrup, Arno Buecker, Tobias Schaeffter, Matthias Stuber, Rolf W Günther, Rene M Botnar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the impact of radial k-space sampling and steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging on image quality in MRI of coronary vessel walls. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eleven subjects were examined on a 1.5-T MR system using three high-resolution navigator-gated and cardiac-triggered 3D black blood sequences (cartesian gradient-echo [GRE], radial GRE, and radial SSFP) with identical spatial resolution (0.9 x 0.9 x 2.4 mm3). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), vessel wall sharpness, and motion artifacts were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean SNR and CNR of the coronary vessel wall were improved using radial imaging and were best using radial k-space sampling combined with SSFP imaging. Vessel border definition was similar for all three sequences. Radial k-space sampling was found to be less sensitive to motion. Consistently good image quality was seen with the radial GRE sequence.
CONCLUSION: Radial k-space sampling in MRI of coronary vessel walls resulted in fewer motion artifacts and improved SNR and CNR. The use of SSFP imaging, however, did not result in improved coronary vessel wall visualization.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16714616     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the abdomen and chest using a radial gradient echo sequence with K-space weighted image contrast (KWIC).

Authors:  Kyung Won Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Yong Sik Jeon; Sung Eun Kang; Jee Hyun Baek; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi; Yung-Jue Bang; Berthold Kiefer; Kai Tobias Block; Hyunjun Ji; Simon Bauer; Chin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Contribution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sophie Mavrogeni; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Genovefa Kolovou
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-26

Review 3.  Coronary magnetic resonance imaging: visualization of the vessel lumen and the vessel wall and molecular imaging of arteriothrombosis.

Authors:  Elmar Spuentrup; Rene M Botnar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Multicenter epidemiological studies of atherosclerosis imaging.

Authors:  Songtao Liu; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08

5.  Coronary vessel wall evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: determinants of image quality.

Authors:  Ashkan A Malayeri; Robson Macedo; Debiao Li; Shaoguang Chen; Hossein Bahrami; Shenghan Lai; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Non-contrast coronary artery wall and plaque imaging using inversion-recovery prepared steady-state free precession.

Authors:  Takeshi Ishimoto; Yasuyo Taniguchi; Tosiaki Miyati; Momoe Kawakami; Masaru Ishihara
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: where are we today?

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Rene M Botnar; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.931

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.