Literature DB >> 16713040

Evaluation of substitutes for bone: comparison of microradiographic and histological assessments.

M Thorwarth1, F Wehrhan, S Srour, S Schultze-Mosgau, E Felszeghy, R D Bader, K A Schlegel.   

Abstract

We created defects of standard size in the frontal bones of adult pigs and filled them with four different materials. On six occasions (at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks), samples were harvested, and evaluated by computing microradiographic images. We examined the specimens histologically as controls. After insertion of anorganic materials, microradiographic evaluation was easy and precise, and there were no significant differences between them and the histological controls (p=0.2). A quantitative evaluation of chemically sterilised bone by computer was not possible for more than 4 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16713040     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  3 in total

1.  Sinus augmentation with phycogene hydroxyapatite: histological and histomorphometrical results after 6 months in humans. A case series.

Authors:  Antonio Scarano; Marco Degidi; Vittoria Perrotti; Adriano Piattelli; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-09-24

2.  Elastomeric enriched biodegradable polyurethane sponges for critical bone defects: a successful case study reducing donor site morbidity.

Authors:  Catarina Lavrador; Ramiro Mascarenhas; Paulo Coelho; Cláudia Brites; Alfredo Pereira; Sylwester Gogolewski
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.

Authors:  Rusin Zhao; Ruijia Yang; Paul R Cooper; Zohaib Khurshid; Amin Shavandi; Jithendra Ratnayake
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.